Technical Papers
Sep 25, 2021

Effects of Public Supports for Mitigating Revenue Risk in Public–Private Partnership Projects: Model to Choose Among Support Alternatives

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 12

Abstract

Public supports for mitigating revenue risk in public–private partnership (PPP) projects are used for attracting private financing for public infrastructure. The difficult assessment of impacts that these supports may have on PPP projects may lead to choosing a nonoptimal form of guarantee. The intrinsic PPP project characteristic of partnerships among different actors lasting a long period imposes the simultaneous achievement of competing objectives and a greater transparency in risk allocation. This paper proposes a structured model for assessing and benchmarking the impact of different public supports released to mitigate revenue risk in PPP projects, from the standpoints of the private and public actors, for choosing the public support that better ensures the achievement of a win–win condition. First, we quantify the net benefit gained by each party under three support instruments, namely the minimum revenue guarantee (MRG), least present value of revenue (LPVR), and price cap (PC), by identifying the condition of satisfaction of the involved actors and analyzing the probability that such condition is not achieved for each party. Then, by applying the Monte Carlo simulation, we benchmark and choose the public support that ensures compliance with the win–win condition. We use two case studies to apply the model and a plan of experiments for investigating how the choice of the optimal form of public subsidy for revenue risk mitigation may change based on contextual factors and project characteristics. The results reveal that public supports are not beneficial to all parties, since they generate, under different conditions, unequal net economic benefits for the two parties and/or unfair risk allocation. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that the win–win condition achievement, in terms of actors’ performance and risk allocation, depends on the characteristics of the project and of public supports. The findings of the study emphasize the importance of the accurate selection of the form of public support before its releasement in order to ensure a successful PPP.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Almassi, A., B. McCabe, and M. Thompson. 2013. “Real options–based approach for valuation of government guarantees in public–private partnerships.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (2): 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000117.
Ashuri, B., H. Kashani, K. R. Molenaar, S. Lee, and J. Lu. 2012. “Risk-neutral pricing approach for evaluating BOT highway projects with government minimum revenue guarantee option.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (4): 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000447.
Blanco, C., S. Choi, and D. Soronow. 2001. “Energy price processes used for derivatives pricing and risk management.” Commod. Now Energy Pricing 1: 74–80.
Blanco, C., and D. Soronow. 2001a. “Jump diffusion processes—Energy price processes used for derivatives pricing and risk management.” Commod. Now Energy Pricing 2: 83–87.
Blanco, C., and D. Soronow. 2001b. “Mean reverting processes—Energy price processes used for derivatives pricing and risk management.” Commod. Now Energy Pricing 2: 68–72.
Brandao, L. E., and E. Saraiva. 2008. “The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure projects.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 26 (11): 1171–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802428051.
Brealey, R., and S. Myers. 2000. Principles of corporate finance. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Burke, R., and I. Demirag. 2015. “Changing perceptions on PPP games: Demand risk in Irish roads.” Crit. Perspect. Accounting 27 (Mar): 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.11.002.
Carbonara, N., N. Costantino, and R. Pellegrino. 2014a. “Concession period for PPPs: A win–win model for a fair risk sharing.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (7): 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.007.
Carbonara, N., N. Costantino, and R. Pellegrino. 2014b. “Revenue guarantee in public-private partnerships: A fair risk allocation model.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 32 (4): 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.906638.
Carbonara, N., and R. Pellegrino. 2018. “Revenue guarantee in public–private partnerships: A win–win model.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 36 (10): 584–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1467028.
Carmichael, D. G. 2020. “Project delivery—PPP guarantees.” In Future-proofing—Valuing adaptability, flexibility, convertibility and options, 77–97. Singapore: Springer.
Cheah, C. Y., and J. Liu. 2006. “Valuing governmental support in infrastructure projects as real options using Monte Carlo simulation.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 24 (5): 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500435572.
Chiara, N., M. Garvin, and J. Vecer. 2007. “Valuing simple multiple-exercise real options in infrastructure projects.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 13 (2): 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:2(97).
Chou, J. S., H. P. Tserng, C. Lin, and C. P. Yeh. 2012. “Critical factors and risk allocation for PPP policy: Comparison between HSR and general infrastructure projects.” Transp. Policy 22 (Jul): 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.009.
Cui, C., Y. Liu, A. Hope, and J. Wang. 2018. “Review of studies on the public–private partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 36 (5): 773–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.004.
Czerny, A. I. 2006. “Price-cap regulation of airports: Single-till versus dual-till.” J. Regul. Econ. 30 (1): 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-006-0010-9.
Deng, S. 2000. Stochastic models of energy commodity prices and their applications: Mean-reversion with jumps and spikes. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Energy Institute.
Dixit, A. K., and R. S. Pindyck. 1995. “The options approach to capital investment.” In Real options and investment under uncertainty-classical readings and recent contributions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Engel, E. M., R. D. Fischer, and A. Galetovic. 2001. “Least-present-value-of-revenue auctions and highway franchising.” J. Political Econ. 109 (5): 993–1020. https://doi.org/10.1086/322832.
EPEC (European PPP Expertise Centre). 2010. Eurostat treatment of public-private partnerships purposes, methodology and recent trends. Luxembourg: EPEC.
Garvin, M. J., and C. Y. J. Cheah. 2004. “Valuation techniques for infrastructure investment decisions.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 22 (4): 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190310001649010.
Hemming, R. 2006. Public-private partnerships, government guarantees, and fiscal risk. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Iyer, K. C., and M. Sagheer. 2011. “A real options-based traffic risk mitigation model for build-operate- transfer highway projects in India.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 29 (8): 771–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.597412.
Jiang, Y. 2017. “Selection of PPP projects in China based on government guarantees and fiscal risk control.” Int. J. Financ. Res. 8 (1): 99–111. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v8n1p99.
Jin, L., Z. Zhang, and J. Song. 2020. “Profit allocation and subsidy mechanism for public–private partnership toll road projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (3): 04020011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000766.
Liu, J., and C. Y. Cheah. 2009. “Real option application in PPP/PFI project negotiation.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 27 (4): 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902807071.
Liu, J., P. E. Love, J. Smith, M. Regan, and M. Sutrisna. 2014. “Public-private partnerships: A review of theory and practice of performance measurement.” Int. J. Productivity Perform. Manage. 63 (4): 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2013-0154.
Liu, T., M. Bennon, M. J. Garvin, and S. Wang. 2017. “Sharing the big risk: Assessment framework for revenue risk sharing mechanisms in transportation public-private partnerships.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (12): 04017086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001397.
Osei-Kyei, R., and A. P. Chan. 2015. “Review of studies on the critical success factors for public–private partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (6): 1335–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.008.
Pellegrino, R., N. Carbonara, and N. Costantino. 2019. “Public guarantees for mitigating interest rate risk in PPP projects.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 9 (2): 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2018-0012.
Pellegrino, R., L. Ranieri, N. Costantino, and G. Mummolo. 2011. “A real options-based model to supporting risk allocation in price cap regulation approach for public utilities.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 29 (12): 1197–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.647828.
Pellegrino, R., N. Vajdic, and N. Carbonara. 2013. “Real option theory for risk mitigation in transport PPPs.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 3 (2): 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-05-2012-0027.
Pichayapan, P., S. Hino, K. Kishi, and K. Satoh. 2003. “Real option analysis in evaluation of expressway projects under uncertainties.” J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 5: 3015–3030.
Roques, F. A., and N. S. Savva. 2006. Price cap regulation and investment incentives under demand uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Electricity Policy Research Group, Judge Institute of Management, Univ. of Cambridge.
Rouhani, O. M., R. R. Geddes, W. Do, H. O. Gao, and A. Beheshtian. 2018. “Revenue-risk-sharing approaches for public-private partnership provision of highway facilities.” Case Stud. Transp. Policy 6 (4): 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.04.003.
Shahraki, A., and S. B. Ebrahimi. 2015. “A new approach for forecasting enrollments using harmony search algorithm.” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28 (1): 279–290. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-141298.
Shan, L., M. J. Garvin, and R. Kumar. 2010. “Collar options to manage revenue risks in real toll public-private partnership transportation projects.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 28 (10): 1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.506645.
Shen, L. Y., H. J. Bao, Y. Z. Wu, and W. S. Lu. 2007. “Using bargaining-game theory for negotiating concession period for BOT-type contract.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (5): 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:5(385).
Song, J., Y. Zhao, L. Jin, and Y. Sun. 2018. “Pareto optimization of public-private partnership toll road contracts with government guarantees.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 117 (Nov): 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.019.
Vassallo, J. M., and J. Gallego. 2005. “Risk sharing in the new public works concession law in Spain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1932 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193200101.
Villalba-Romero, F., and C. L. Liyanage. 2016. “Evaluating success in PPP road projects in Europe: A comparison of performance measurement approaches.” Transp. Res. Procedia 14: 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.089.
Vose, D. 1996. Quantitative risk analysis: A guide to Monte Carlo simulation modelling. New York: Wiley.
Wibowo, A. 2004. “Valuing guarantees in a BOT infrastructure project.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 11 (6): 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980410571543.
Xiong, W., and X. Zhang. 2014. “Concession renegotiation models for projects developed through public-private partnerships.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (5): 04014008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000843.
Ye, S., and R. L. Tiong. 2003. “Tariff adjustment frameworks for privately financed infrastructure projects.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 21 (4): 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000073550.
Yuan, J., A. Y. Zeng, M. J. Skibniewski, and Q. Li. 2009. “Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public–private partnership projects to achieve value for money.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 27 (3): 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902748705.
Zapata Quimbayo, C. A., C. A. Mejía Vega, and N. L. Marques. 2019. “Minimum revenue guarantees valuation in PPP projects under a mean reverting process.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 37 (3): 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1500024.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 12December 2021

History

Received: Jul 1, 2020
Accepted: Feb 9, 2021
Published online: Sep 25, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 25, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mechanics Mathematics and Management, Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, Bari 70125, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1098-4547. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Analyzing the Optimization of Subsidies for PPP Urban Rail Transit Projects: A Choice between Passenger Demand, Vehicle Kilometer, or an Improved Efficiency-Oriented Framework, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13483, 150, 1, (2024).
  • A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP LITERATURE PUBLISHED BETWEEN 2012 AND 2021, JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 10.3846/jcem.2023.17926, 29, 3, (238-252), (2023).
  • Effect of the Internal Agency Problem on Risk-Sharing Incentive Contracts in Public–Private Partnership Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13727, 149, 12, (2023).
  • Value Creation in PPP Projects Undertaken in the Turkish Healthcare Industry, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13473, 149, 11, (2023).
  • Decision Framework for Efficient Risk Mitigation in BOT Highway Infrastructure Service Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13014, 149, 9, (2023).
  • Incorporating Social Benefits in Concession Price Negotiation for Public–Private Partnership Contracts, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000582, 15, 1, (2023).
  • The private in the public: The case of Norwegian private zoning plans, Land Use Policy, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106585, 127, (106585), (2023).
  • A selectivity index for public-private partnership projects in the urban water and sanitation sector in Latin America and the caribbean, Journal of Environmental Management, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117564, 335, (117564), (2023).
  • Project-focussed literature on public-private partnership (PPP) in developing countries: a critical review, Production Planning & Control, 10.1080/09537287.2022.2123408, (1-28), (2022).
  • Stakeholder management mapping to improve public-private partnership success in emerging country water projects: Indonesia’s experience, Utilities Policy, 10.1016/j.jup.2022.101411, 78, (101411), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share