Technical Papers
Aug 17, 2021

Axiology-Based Valuation Modeling for Human-Centered Decision Making in Building Planning and Design

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 11

Abstract

Understanding and assessing the value of building systems to stakeholders and the impacts of decision making on this value has become a national imperative. However, there is still a lack of understanding and formalized modeling of what different stakeholders value (e.g., energy conservation, safety, economic growth) in buildings and how to valuate (i.e., quantify the worth) buildings based on these values. This paper proposes an axiology-based valuation modeling approach. Axiology is a theory of value (worth) that explores questions such as what are the objects that we value and how to measure their value. The paper focuses on presenting an axiology-based mathematical value quantification and aggregation model for quantifying the worth of a building object based on object properties and stakeholder values. The proposed model is theoretically grounded in formal axiology. It builds on two key notions in Hartman’s formal axiology. First, object valuation depends on its properties. Second, valuation has systemic, extrinsic, and intrinsic dimensions. The model was validated through predictive validation, which measures the correlation between actual stakeholder rankings of valuated objects and model-predicted rankings. The results of the validation show that there is a very strong and significant positive correlation between the two types of rankings, which indicates that the proposed valuation model is valid. The proposed model contributes to the body of knowledge by offering a way to assess the value of building objects based on stakeholder values; it could facilitate value-sensitive decision making by embodying stakeholder values in project planning and design toward better synergy between human values and the built environment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Science Foundation (NSF). This paper is based upon work supported by NSF under Grant No. 1254679. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. This journal paper is also based on the following Ph.D. dissertation: Zhang, L. (2016). “Axiology-based modeling and valuation for human-centered and value-sensitive building design.” Ph.D. dissertation, Champaign, Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/95460.

References

Aebi, C. 2013. “Formal axiology.” Accessed October 23, 2019. http://www.carolaebi.com/2013/08/05/formal-axiology/.
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2007. Integrated project delivery: A guide. Washington, DC: AIA.
AI (Axiometrics International). 2002. Validity studies of the Hartman profile model. Juliet, TN: AI.
Andresen, I. 2000. “A multi-criteria decision-making method for solar building design.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Building Technology, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology.
Bal, M., D. Bryde, D. Fearon, and E. Ochieng. 2013. “Stakeholder engagement: Achieving sustainability in the construction sector.” Sustainability 5 (2): 695–710. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020695.
Barima, O. 2009. “Examination of the best, analogous, competing terms to describe value in construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 28 (3): 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.009.
Barreiro-Hurlé, J., and J. A. Gómez-Limón. 2008. “Reconsidering heterogeneity and aggregation issues in environmental valuation: A multi-attribute approach.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 40: 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9169-5.
Blanc, I., D. Friot, M. Margni, and O. Jolliet. 2008. “Towards a new index for environmental sustainability based on a DALY weighting approach.” Sustainable Dev. 16 (4): 251–260.
Blundell, R., and T. M. Stoker. 2005. “Heterogeneity and aggregation.” J. Econ. Lit. 43 (2): 347–391. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051054661486.
Boulanger, P. 2008. “Sustainable development indicators: A scientific challenge, a democratic issue.” Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc. 1 (1): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.5194/sapiens-1-59-2008.
Cheng, A., and K. R. Fleischmann. 2010. “Developing a meta-inventory of human values.” In Proc., Association for Information Science and Technology (ASIST 2010). Silver Spring, MD: Association for Information Science and Technology.
Clear Direction. 2001. “Axiology.” Accessed June 28, 2020. http://www.cleardirection.com/docs/axiology.asp.
Clevenger, A. P., J. Wierzchowski, B. Chruszcz, and K. Gunson. 2002. “GIS-generated, expert-based models for identifying wildlife habitat linkages and planning mitigation passages” Conserv. Biol. 16 (2): 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00328.x.
Dicken, T. M., and R. B. Edwards. 2001. Dialogues on values and centers of value: Old friends, new thoughts. Leiden, Netherlands: Rodopi Bv.
East, W. 2020. “Common building information model files and tools.” Accessed June 9, 2020. http://www.nibs.org/?page=bsa_commonbimfiles.
El-Gohary, N. 2010. “Model-based automated value analysis of building projects.” In Proc., CIB W78 2010-27th Int. Conf. Rotterdam, Netherlands: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction.
El-Gohary, N. M., H. Osman, and T. E. El-Diraby. 2006. “Stakeholder management for public private partnerships.” Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (7): 595–604.
Friedman, B., P. H. Kahn, Jr, A. Borning, and A. Borning. 2013. “Value sensitive design and information systems.” In Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory, 55–95. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer.
Gilb, T. 2006. “Quantifying stakeholder values.” Accessed June 29, 2020. www.gilb.com/dl36.
Goh, K., and J. Yang. 2013. “Importance of sustainability related cost components in highway infrastructure: Perspective of stakeholders in Australia.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (1): 04013002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000152.
Goodman, L. A. 1961. “Snowball sampling.” Ann. Math. Stat. 32 (1): 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148.
Hartman, R. 1967a. The structure of value. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Hartman, R. 1967b. “Formal axiology and the measurement of value.” J. Value Inquiry 1 (1): 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149464.
Hayati, E., B. Majnounian, E. Abdi, J. Sessions, and M. Makhdoum. 2013. “An expert-based approach to forest road network planning by combining Delphi and spatial multi-criteria evaluation.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 185 (2): 1767–1776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2666-1.
ICC (International Code Council). 2012. “2012 International building code.” Accessed October 23, 2014. http://publicecodes.cyberregs.com/icod/ibc/2012/index.htm.
Insight Consulting. 2020. “The science of axiology.” Accessed June 28, 2020. http://www.valueinsights.com/.
Kelly, J. 2007. “Making client values explicit in value management workshops.” J. Constr. Manage. Econ. 25 (4): 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190601071839.
Laerd Dissertation. 2014. “Criterion validity (concurrent and predictive validity).” Accessed November 26, 2014. http://dissertation.laerd.com/criterion-validity-concurrent-and-predictive-validity.php.
Laerd Statistics. 2014. “The ultimate IBM® SPSS® guides.” Accessed August 31, 2014. https://statistics.laerd.com/.
Levitt, R. 2007. “CEM research for the next 50 years: Maximizing economic, environmental, and societal value of the built environment.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (9): 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:9(619).
Linkov, I., and J. Steevens. 2008. “Chapter 35 appendix A: Multi-criteria decision analysis.” In Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 619–815. New York: Springer.
Macedo, P., C. Sapateiro, and J. Filipe. 2006. “Distinct approaches to value system in collaborative network environments.” In Proc., 7th IFIP Working Conf. Virtual Enterprises (PRO-VE’06), 111–120. Tokyo: United Nations Univ.
Moore, G. E. 1992. Principia ethica. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mueller, R. W. 1969. “The axiology of Robert S. Hartman: A critical study.” J. Value Inquiry 3 (1): 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137667.
Mukherjee, A., and H. Muga. 2009. “A decision-making framework to assess stakeholder value in adoption of sustainable practices in construction.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress (CRC 2009), 548–557. Reston, VA: ASCE.
NIBS (National Institute of Building Sciences). 2014. “Project planning, delivery and controls.” Accessed October 30, 2015. http://www.wbdg.org/project/pm.php.
NRC (National Research Council). 2009. “Sustainable critical infrastructure systems: A framework for meeting 21st century imperatives.” In Toward sustainable critical infrastructure systems: Framing the challenges workshop committee-national research council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2008. Handbook on constructing composite indicators-Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD.
Ormazabal, G., B. Viñolas, and A. Aguado. 2008. “Enhancing value in crucial decisions: Line 9 of the Barcelona subway.” J. Manage. Eng. 24 (4): 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2008)24:4(265).
Pathak, A., L. Zhang, and N. E. Ganapati. 2020. “Understanding multi-sector stakeholder value dynamics in hurricane Michael to facilitate collaborative decision making in disaster contexts.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 21 (3): 04020032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000400.
Poli, R. 2006. “Value wholes.” In Mysli ojezyku, nauce i wartosciach, 371–385. Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Wiedza Powszechna.
SAVE International. 2007. Value methodology standard and body of knowledge. Dayton, OH: SAVE International.
Schwartz, S. H. 2006. “Basic human values: An overview.” Accessed June 27, 2020. https://yourmorals.org/schwartz.2006.basic%20human%20values.pdf.
SEP (Standard Encyclopedia of Philosophy). 2008. “Value theory.” Accessed October 27, 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/value-theory/.
SE (Schneider Electric). 2012. Why invest in high-performance green buildings. Rueil-Malmaison, France: SE.
Shenton, A. K. 2004. “Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects.” Educ. Inform. 22 (2): 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.
Smith, B., and A. Thomas. 1998. “Axiology.” In Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy, 608–-612. London: Routledge.
Smith, R. K. 2006. Validation studies for the Harman value profile. Dallas: Clear Direction.
Spink, A. 2002. “A user-centered approach to evaluating human interaction with web search engines: An exploratory study.” Inf. Process. Manage. 38 (3): 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00036-X.
Stephan, K., and C. Menassa. 2015. “Modeling the effect of building stakeholder interactions on value perception of sustainable retrofits.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (4): B4014006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000409.
UGroningen (University of Groningen). 2014. “The solution with Spearman’s rho.” Accessed November 25, 2014. http://www.ppsw.rug.nl/∼bve/stat/module8/3Spearman.html.
USDOE (US Department of Energy). 2012. 2012 international energy conservation code (IECC). Washington, DC: USDOE.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2008. LEED for homes rating system. Washington, DC: USGBC.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2009. LEED reference guide for design and construction. Washington, DC: USGBC.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2013a. LEED reference guide for building design and construction. Washington, DC: USGBC.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2013b. LEED reference guide for homes design and construction. Washington, DC: USGBC.
VALiD (Value in Design). 2020. “VALiD principles.” Accessed June 27, 2020. http://software.adeptmanagement.org/valid.html.
Weathington, B. L., and D. P. Roberts. 2005. Validation analysis of the Hartman value profile. Chattanooga, TN: BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee.
Widen, K., S. Olander, and B. Atkin. 2014. “Links between successful innovation diffusion and stakeholder engagement.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (5): 04014018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000214.
Xing, X., B. Zhong, H. Luo, H. Li, and H. Wu. 2019. “Ontology for safety risk identification in metro construction.” Comput. Ind. 109: 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.001.
Yang, R. J., and G. Q. P. Shen. 2014. “Framework for stakeholder management in construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (4): 04014064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000285.
Yanow, D., and P. Schwartz-Shea. 2006. Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. London: Routledge.
Zhang, L. 2016. “Axiology-based modeling and valuation for human-centered and value-sensitive building design.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Zhang, L., and N. M. El-Gohary. 2016. “Discovering stakeholder values for axiology-based value analysis of building projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (4): 4015095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001004.
Zhang, L., and N. M. El-Gohary. 2017. “Human-centered value analysis: Building value aggregation based on human values and building system integration.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (8): 04017040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001252.
Zhang, L., and N. M. El-Gohary. 2018. “Automated IFC-based building information modeling and extraction for supporting value analysis of buildings.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 20 (4): 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1484850.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: Aug 3, 2020
Accepted: Jan 11, 2021
Published online: Aug 17, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 17, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lu Zhang, A.M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and Sustainability, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International Univ., 10555 West Flagler St., Miami, FL 33174.
Nora M. El-Gohary, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Integrating Stakeholder Value Dynamics with Resilience Evaluation for Housing, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485279.020, (186-196), (2024).
  • Human-centred and BIM-integrated automated value analysis of buildings, International Journal of Construction Management, 10.1080/15623599.2022.2025555, (1-13), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share