Forecasting the Construction Expenditure Cash Flow for Transportation Design-Build Projects with a Case-Based Reasoning Model
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 6
Abstract
Accurately forecasting the construction expenditure cash flow of transportation projects is critical for state departments of transportation (state DOTs) to secure sufficient funding to cover their fiscal obligations throughout the project development timeline. However, there is no quantitative model to assist state DOTs in accurately forecasting expenditure cash flows for design-build projects. At the outset of awarding a typical design-build contract, the design has not been finalized to enable exact quantities for a detailed cost estimate. This issue represents a big difference between design-build and design-bid-build projects that makes estimating the project payouts more difficult for design-build projects. This research for the first time creates an expenditure cash-flow forecasting model for transportation design-build projects based on case-based reasoning and a genetic algorithm. The model utilizes information about project-specific characteristics and external market factors. The applicability of the proposed model is examined on a data set of 33 transportation design-build projects delivered by Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) from April 2007 to January 2020. The results show great accuracy in forecasting expenditure cash flows of these projects. The major contribution of this study lies on the creation of a new forecasting model, which enables reasonably accurate prediction of expenditure cash flow of transportation design-build projects. This research identifies that even early at the procurement phase of a design-build project when exact quantities and detailed cost estimates have not been fully developed, the combination of conceptual project information and local construction market indicators offers the capability to predict the future expenditure cash flow of the project through establishing similarities between the project to be awarded and historical design-build projects. This research provides a novel approach to quantify the similarities that will be used as critical inputs into a case-based reasoning algorithm for predicting the expenditure cash flow of the project using expenditure records of most similar historical projects in the design-build data set. It is anticipated that transportation agencies can benefit from the forecasting model presented in this study by enhancing their processes of estimating their financial obligations on the onset of letting design-build contracts. The forecasting model will help transportation agencies to avoid underestimating and overestimating the capital needed to build a design-build project during the contract duration. Therefore, limited financial resources of transportation government agencies will be utilized more efficiently and effectively, and the likelihood of running into disputes for fund unavailability and cost overruns will be reduced.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request: design-build database of project expenditure records and case-based reasoning and genetic algorithm.
References
Ahmed, F., and K. Deb. 2013. “Multi-objective optimal path planning using elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms.” Soft Comput. 17 (7): 1283–1299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-012-0964-8.
Ahn, J., M. Park, H. S. Lee, S. J. Ahn, S. H. Ji, K. Song, and B. S. Son. 2017. “Covariance effect analysis of similarity measurement methods for early construction cost estimation using case-based reasoning.” Autom. Constr. 81 (Sep): 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.009.
Arditi, D., and O. B. Tokdemir. 1999. “Comparison of case-based reasoning and artificial neural networks.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 13 (3): 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1999)13:3(162).
Ashuri, B., K. Mostaan, and D. Hannon. 2013. How can innovative project delivery systems improve the overall efficiency of GDOT in transportation project delivery?. Atlanta: Georgia DOT.
Baek, M., and B. Ashuri. 2019. “Analysis of the variability of submitted unit price bids for asphalt line items in highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (4): 04019020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001638.
Camph, D. H. 2008. “White paper: Fiscal constraint- or fiscal restraint? Issues of compliance with federal requirements for STIPs, TIPs and long-range plans.” Accessed April 20, 2020. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/NCHRP08-36(76D)_FiscalFR.pdf.
Chao, L. C., and C. F. Chien. 2009. “Estimating project S-curves using polynomial function and neural networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (3): 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:3(169).
Demetracopoulou, V., W. J. O’Brien, and N. Khwaja. 2020. “Lessons learned from selection of project delivery methods in highway projects: The Texas experience.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 04519040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000340.
Eiben, A. E., and J. E. Smith. 2015. Introduction to evolutionary computing. 2nd ed. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Faghih, S. A. M., and H. Kashani. 2018. “Forecasting construction material prices using vector error correction model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (8): 04018075. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001528.
GDOT (Georgia DOT). 2015. “Transportation Funding Act of 2015-10 year strategic transportation plan & project prioritization.” Accessed March 31, 2020. http://www.dot.ga.gov/AboutGeorgia/Board/Presentations/TransportationFundingAct-10YearStrategicTransPlan-ProjectPrioritization.pdf.
GDOT (Georgia DOT). 2021. “Asphalt & fuel index.” Accessed March 3, 2021. http://www.dot.ga.gov/PS/Materials/AsphaltFuelIndex.
Jarrah, R., D. Kulkarni, and J. T. O’Connor. 2007. “Cash flow projections for selected TxDoT highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (3): 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:3(235).
Kwon, N., J. Cho, H. S. Lee, I. Yoon, and M. Park. 2019. “Compensation cost estimation model for construction noise claims using case-based reasoning.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (8): 04019047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001675.
Liu, M., E. J. Jaselskis, W. J. Rasdorf, L. Goode, and A. Alsharef. 2015. Design of a construction expenditure forecasting and monitoring tool for NCDOT mega projects. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina DOT.
Mills, P., and H. A. Tasaico. 2005. “Forecasting payments made under construction contracts payout curves and cash management in the North Carolina Department of Transportation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1907 (1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105190700104.
NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2017. Evolving debt finance practices for surface transportation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Poister, T. H. 2010. “The future of strategic planning in the public sector: linking strategic management and performance.” Supplement, Public Adm. Rev. 70 (S1): s246–s254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02284.x.
Rall, J., J. B. Reed, and N. J. Farber. 2010. Public-private partnerships for transportation: a toolkit for legislators. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.
Richter, M. M., and R. O. Weber. 2013. Case-based reasoning: A textbook. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Shiha, A., E. M. Dorra, and K. Nassar. 2020. “Neural networks model for prediction of construction material prices in Egypt using macroeconomic indicators.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (3): 04020010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001785.
Su, Y., and G. Lucko. 2015. “Synthetic cash flow model with singularity functions for unbalanced bidding scenarios.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 33 (1): 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1012527.
USBLS (US Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2021a. “Producer price indexes.” Accessed March 3, 2021. https://www.bls.gov/ppi/.
USBLS (US Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2021b. “Job openings and labor turnover survey.” Accessed March 3, 2021. https://www.bls.gov/jlt/.
USDOT. n.d. “Top management challenges.” Accessed October 7, 2020. https://www.oig.dot.gov/top-management-challenges.
USDOT. 2019. “DOT’s fiscal year 2020 top management challenges.” Accessed September 4, 2020. https://www.oig.dot.gov/sites/default/files/DOT%20Top%20Management%20Challenges%20%20FY2020.pdf.
Zhang, Y., X. Li, and Q. Wang. 2009. “Hybrid genetic algorithm for permutation flowshop scheduling problems with total flowtime minimization.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196 (3): 869–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.04.033.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 6, 2020
Accepted: Dec 22, 2020
Published online: Mar 29, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 29, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.