Technical Papers
May 8, 2018

Vehicle Weight Limits and Overload Permit Checking Considering the Cumulative Fatigue Damage of Bridges

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 7

Abstract

The ever-increasing demand in freight transportation results in a fast-growing number of overload permit requests every year. Overweight trucks, if not properly managed, can induce excessive fatigue damage that could significantly reduce bridges’ load-carrying capacity and affect their durability. Therefore, developing rational vehicle weight limits and procedures for overload permit checking is very important to ensure the safety of bridges. In the current practice of overweight vehicle management, a permit decision is usually made by checking the ratio of the load effect imposed by the overweight truck to the design vehicle load effect against an allowable limit. The fatigue damage on the bridge due to the repeated vehicular loads and its influence on bridges’ load-carrying capacity are usually ignored. The widely adopted federal bridge formula in the United States has also been criticized as being too restrictive for vehicles with certain axle configurations. In this article, a method for determining vehicle weight limit and overload permit checking is proposed based on the consideration of the cumulative fatigue damage of bridges. A typical steel–concrete composite girder bridge is used as an example for illustrating the proposed method. Based on the results from this study, the rationality of the federal bridge formula is discussed. The results from this study can not only be used to develop vehicle weight limits and assist in overload permit checking but also to assess the fatigue damage and predict the remaining fatigue life of existing bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 51778222 and 51478176), the Key Research Project of Hunan Province (Grant 2017SK2224) and the China Scholarship Council (Grant 201706130087).

References

AASHTO. 1990. Guide specifications for fatigue evaluation of existing steel bridges. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2012. LRFD bridge design specifications. 6th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Brühwiler, E., and A. Herwig. 2008. “Consideration of dynamic traffic action effects on existing bridges at ultimate limit state.” In Proc. of IABMAS ’08: 4th Int. Conf. on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, 3675–3682, edited by H. M. Koh and D. M. Frangopol, London: Taylor & Francis.
Cha, H., B. Liu, A. Prakash, and A. H. Varma. 2016. “Effect of local damage caused by overweight trucks on the durability of steel bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (1): 04014183. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000685.
Connor, R., I. Hodgson, H. Mahmoud, and C. Bowman. 2005. Field testing and fatigue evaluation of the I-79 Neville Island Bridge over the Ohio River. Rep. No. ATLASS 05-04. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh Univ. Center for Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems.
Correia, J. R., and F. A. Branco. 2006. “New methodology: Permit checking of vehicular overloads.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (3): 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:3(274).
Correia, J. R., M. R. T. Arruda, and F. A. Branco. 2014. “Structural assessment of reinforced-concrete arch underpasses subjected to vehicular overloads.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (2): 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000410.
Downing, S. D., and D. F. Socie. 1982. “Simple rainflow counting algorithms.” Int. J. Fatigue 4 (1): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(82)90018-4.
Eom, J., and A. S. Nowak. 2001. “Live load distribution for steel girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (6): 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(489).
Fatemi, A., and L. Yang. 1998. “Cumulative fatigue damage and life prediction theories: A survey of the state of the art for homogeneous materials.” Int. J. Fatigue 20 (1): 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-9.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1994. Bridge formula weights. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Fu, G., and J. You. 2009. “Truck loads and bridge capacity evaluation in China.” J. Bridge Eng. 14 (5): 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000006.
Ghosn, M. 2000. “Development of truck weight regulations using bridge reliability model.” J. Bridge Eng. 5 (4): 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:4(293).
Ghosn, M., N. Parker, G. Fiorillo, V. Gayovyy, T. Getso, and S. Ahmed. 2015. Effect of overweight vehicles on NYSDOT infrastructure. Final Rep. No. NYSDOT C-08-13. Albany, NY: New York State Dept. of Transportation.
González, A., D. Cantero, and E. J. O’Brien. 2011. “Dynamic increment for shear force due to heavy vehicles crossing a highway bridge.” Comput. Struct. 89 (23–24): 2261–2272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.08.009.
Harris, D. K., and A. Gheitasi. 2013. “Implementation of an energy-based stiffened plate formulation for lateral load distribution characteristics of girder-type bridges.” Eng. Struct. 54: 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.04.002.
IDOT (Indiana Dept. of Transportation). 2010. “Bridge inspection manual.” Accessed September 17, 2014. http://www.in.gov/dot/div/contracts/standards/bridge/inspector_manual/.
James, R. W., J. S. Noel, H. L. Furr, and F. E. Bonilla. 1986. “Proposed new truck weight limit formula.” J. Struct. Eng. 112 (7): 1589–1604. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:7(1589).
Jaykishan, Y. 2005. “Evaluation of a new bridge formula for regulation of truck weights.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ.
Kwon, K., D. M. Frangopol, and M. Soliman. 2012. “Probabilistic fatigue life estimation of steel bridges by using a bilinear S-N approach.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (1): 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000225.
Miner, M. A. 1945. “Cumulative damage in fatigue.” J. Appl. Mech. 12: 159–164.
Moshiri, M., and J. Montufar. 2016. “Existing bridge formulas for truck-weight regulation from international jurisdictions and resulting load stresses on single-span bridges.” J. Transp. Eng. 142 (1): 04015038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000810.
Schilling, C. G. 1984. “Stress cycles for fatigue design of steel bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 110 (6): 1222–1234. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:6(1222).
Schilling, C. G., and K. H. Klippstein. 1978. “New method for fatigue design of bridges.” J. Struct. Div. 104 (3): 425–438.
Snyder, R. E., G. E. Likins Jr., and F. Moses, 1985. Loading spectrum experienced by bridge structures in the United States. Rep. No. FHWA/RD-85/012, Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Stallings, J., T. Cousins, and J. Tedesco. 1997. “Fatigue of diaphragm-girder connections.” Transport. Res. Rec. 1594: 34–41. https://doi.org/10.3141/1594-03.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 1990. Truck weight limits: Issues and options. Special Rep. 225. Washington, DC: TRB.
Vigh, A., and L. P. Kollár. 2006. “Approximate analysis of bridges for the routing and permitting procedures of overweight vehicles.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (3): 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:3(282).
Vigh, A., and L. P. Kollár. 2007. “Routing and permitting techniques of overweight vehicles.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (6): 774–784. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:6(774).
Wang, T.-L., C. Liu, D. Huang, and M. Shahawy. 2005. “Truck loading and fatigue damage analysis for girder bridges based on weigh-in-motion data.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (1): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:1(12).
Wood, S. M., N. O. Akinci, J. Liu, and M. D. Bowman. 2007. Long-term effects of super heavy-weight vehicles on bridges. Rep. No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2007/10. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Zhang, W., and C. S. Cai. 2012. “Fatigue reliability assessment for existing bridges considering vehicle speed and road surface conditions.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (3): 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000272.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23Issue 7July 2018

History

Received: Aug 30, 2017
Accepted: Feb 20, 2018
Published online: May 8, 2018
Published in print: Jul 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Oct 8, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lu Deng, Ph.D., M. ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan Univ., Changsha, Hunan 410082, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Wangchen Yan [email protected]
Research Assistant, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha, Hunan 410082, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share