Parameterized Fragility Assessment of Bridges Subjected to Pier Scour and Vehicular Loads
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 7
Abstract
Even though scour-related bridge failures are among the most common causes of bridge failure, the literature lacks studies that have assessed the safety of scoured bridges to carry vehicular loads. As a result, bridge owners often rely on subjective limits of scour depth triggering closure or load limitations. This study focused on developing fragility functions for bridges subjected to pier scour under vehicular loads. For this purpose, fragility functions parameterized on bridge details, scour depth, and vehicular loads were developed to aid management of traffic on scoured bridges and prevent life-threatening accidents. Instability caused by vehicle-induced loads (i.e., vertical gravity loads and longitudinal loads from vehicle braking) was considered. Therefore, failures resulting from lack of bearing capacity and failure of bridge columns, abutments, and bearings as a result of braking loads were studied. To obtain the fragility functions for these failure modes, a set of 3,500 bridge parameter combinations was generated using Latin hypercube sampling (LHS). For all bridge parameter combinations, bridges were modeled in OpenSees, and finite-element analyses were performed to assess the stability of scoured bridges under vehicular loads. The results show that bridges with pier scour are more vulnerable to bearing failure than to failure from longitudinal braking loads. These analysis results were used to develop fragility functions using logistic regression, which were tested on two bridges in New Zealand. To facilitate application of the fragility functions for practical scenarios where multiple soil layers are present, this study developed a soil homogenization procedure. The fragility functions and the soil homogenization procedure were used to study the performance of a case study bridge in Brazoria County, Texas. The results for the case study bridge show the effects of variation in vehicular load, position of the vehicle, and bridge parameters on the fragility of the bridge, highlighting the usefulness of the fragility functions to support decisions on imposing load and lane restrictions and to study the effects of parameter variation on the performance of bridges with pier scour.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support for this research by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant CMMI-1055301 and the Center for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under financial assistance award 70NANB15H044. The Center for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning is a NIST-funded Center of Excellence; the center is funded through a cooperative agreement between the U.S. National Institute of Science and Technology and Colorado State University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies. The authors also acknowledge the computational facilities in part provided by Big-Data Private-Cloud Research Cyberinfrastructure MRI-award (NSF Grant CNS-1338099) and Rice University.
References
AASHTO. (2012). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
Alipour, A., Shafei, B., and Shinozuka, M. (2013). “Reliability-based calibration of load and resistance factors for design of RC bridges under multiple extreme events: Scour and earthquake.” J. Bridge Eng., 362–371.
API (American Petroleum Institute). (2000). Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms–Working stress design, Washington DC.
Arneson, L. A., Zevenbergen, L. W., Lagasse, P. F., and Clopper, P. E. (2012). “Evaluating scour at bridges” Rep. No. FHWA-HF-12-003 HEC-18, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Banerjee, S., and Prasad, G. G. (2013). “Seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete bridges in flood-prone regions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 9(9), 952–968.
Briaud, J., et al. (2011). “The SRICOS–EFA Method.” Summary Rep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Briaud, J. L., Brandimarte, L., Wang, J., and D’Odorico, P. (2007). “Probability of scour depth exceedance owing to hydrologic uncertainty.” Georisk, 1, 77–88.
Briaud, J. L., Chen, H. C., Kwak, K. W., Han, S. W., and Ting, F. C. K. (2001). “Multiflood and multilayer method for scour rate prediction at bridge piers.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 114–125.
Brown, D. A., Morrison, C., and Reese, L. C. (1988). “Lateral load behavior of pile group in sand.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1261–1276.
Federico, F., Silvagni, G., and Volpi, F. (2003). “Scour vulnerability of river bridge piers.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 890–899.
Ghosn, M. (2005). “Load combination factors for extreme events.” Transp. Res. Rec., 11, 389–397.
Hannigan, P. J., Goble, G. G., Thendean, G., Likins, G. E., and Rausche, F. (1997). “Design and construction of driven pile foundations-volume I.” Rep. No. FHWA-HI-97-013, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Harik, I. E., Shaaban, A. M., Gesund, H., Valli, G. Y. S., and Wang, S. T. (1990). “United States bridge failures, 1951–1988.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 272–277.
Hong, J.-H., Chiew, Y.-M., Lu, J.-Y., Lai, J.-S., and Lin, Y.-B. (2012). “Houfeng Bridge failure in Taiwan.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 186–198.
Hosmer, D., and Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Johnson, P. A., and Ayyub, B. M. (1992). “Assessing time-variant bridge reliability due to pier scour.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 118, 887–903.
Klinga, J. V., and Alipour, A. (2015). “Assessment of structural integrity of bridges under extreme scour conditions.” Eng. Struct., 82, 55–71.
Ko, Y.-Y., Chiou, J.-S., Tsai, Y.-C., Chen, C.-H., Wang, H., and Wang, C.-Y. (2014). “Evaluation of flood-resistant capacity of scoured bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 61–75.
Lin, C., and Parr, A. D. (2013). “Capacity of scour-damaged bridges part 2: Integrated analysis program (IAP)—A program for the analysis of lateral performance of pile-supported structures under scour conditions.” Rep. No. K-Tran: KU-10-2, Kansas Dept. of Transportation, Topeka, KS.
Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1988). “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 1804–1826.
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J. (1979). “Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245.
Melville, B. W., and Coleman, S. E. (2000). Bridge scour, Water Resources Publication, Littleton, CO.
Murphy, K. P. (2012). Machine learning: A probabilistic perspective, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). (2003). “Design of highway bridges for extreme events.” NCHRP Report 489, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Nielson, B. G., (2005). “Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
OpenSees [Computer software]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Padgett, J. E., and DesRoches, R. (2007). “Bridge functionality relationships for improved seismic risk assessment of transportation networks.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(1), 115–130.
Phoon, K.-K. (2008). Reliability-based design in geotechnical engineering: Computations and applications, CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Popovics, S. (1973). “A numerical approach to the complete stress-strain curve of concrete.” Cement Concrete Res., 3, 583–599.
Ramey, G. E., and Brown, D. A. (2004). “Stability of highway bridges subject to scour—Phase 1.” Rep. No. 930-585, Alabama Dept. of Transportation, Montgomery, AL.
Reese, L. C., Cox, W. R., and Koop, F. D., (1975). “Field testing and analysis of laterally loaded piles in stiff clay.” Proc., Offshore Technology Conf., Offshore Technology Conference, Dallas.
Stein, S. M., Young, G. K., Trent, R. E., and Pearson, D. R. (1999). “Prioritizing scour vulnerable bridges using risk.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 95–101.
Su, C.-C., and Lu, J.-Y. (2013). “Measurements and prediction of typhoon-induced short-term general scours in intermittent rivers.” Nat. Hazards, 66(2), 671–687.
Tanasić, N. S. (2015). “Vulnerability of reinforced concrete bridges to local scour in bridge management.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Tandjiria, V., Teh, C. I., and Low, B. K. (2000). “Reliability analysis of laterally loaded piles using response surface methods.” Struct. Saf., 22(4), 335–355.
Wang, Z., Dueñas-Osorio, L., and Padgett, J. E. (2014a). “Influence of scour effects on the seismic response of reinforced concrete bridges.” Eng. Struct., 76, 202–214.
Wang, Z., Padgett, J. E., and Dueñas-Osorio, L. (2014b). “Risk-consistent calibration of load factors for the design of reinforced concrete bridges under the combined effects of earthquake and scour hazards.” Eng. Struct., 79, 86–95.
Wardhana, K., and Hadipriono, F. C. (2003). “Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 144–150.
Zhai, Y., (2010). “Time-dependent scour depth under bridge-submerged flow.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
Zhang, H., Nakagawa, H., Ishigaki, T., Muto, Y., and Baba, Y. (2005). “Three-dimensional mathematical modeling of local scour.” J. Appl. Mech., 8, 803–812.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23 • Issue 7 • July 2018
Copyright
© 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 1, 2017
Accepted: Dec 13, 2017
Published online: Apr 27, 2018
Published in print: Jul 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 27, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.