Tort Reform and Design Professionals
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 3
Abstract
Claims frequency against design professionals continues to increase, and many design firms are foregoing insurance coverage due to the expense. Efforts at tort reform have been sporadic, and some proposals have been attacked on the basis that they alter long‐standing rights without any evidence that they will reduce litigation and insurance expenses. Characteristics of the civil justice system that increase claims frequency against design professionals are reviewed, along with relevant claims survey data. The current system does not cull out the majority of unmeritorious claims prior to trial. Therefore, tort reform efforts should concentrate on modifications to increase the civil justice system's efficiency at removing unmeritorious claims prior to trial. Proposed modifications meeting this criteria are presented. Consistent, knowledgeable involvement by design professionals is necessary to insure that the tort reform debate includes the concerns of design professionals.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alvarez, T. M. (1988). “Facts in the medical malpractice debate.” Kansas City Star, Oct. 30.
2.
American jurisprudence. (1989). 2nd Ed., Vol. 57A, Lawyers Co‐Operative Publishing Co., Rochester, New York, N.Y., 491–493.
3.
“Commonplace concrete remains a big mystery.” (1989). Engrg. Times, 11(2), 15.
4.
Donnelly v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland, 677 P. 2d 1292, 1295 (Ariz. 1984).
5.
“Engineers among top ten in risk.” (1988). ACEC liability & litigation report, Washington, D.C., 2(2), 3.
6.
Grady, M. F. (1988). “Tort reform: An economic approach.” J. Forensic Economics, 2(1), 1–13, 3.
7.
H.R. 1115. (1987). 100th Cong., 1st sess.
8.
H.R. 4317. (1988). 100th Cong., 2nd sess.
9.
“Kansas statutes annotated, 1988 Supplement.” (1988). Vol. 4A, State of Kansas, Dept. of Administration, Topeka, Kans., 60–3412, 330.
10.
“Liability premiums decline.” (1988). Eng. News Rec., 221(20), 19.
11.
Lochhead, C. (1988). “Liability's creative clamp holds firms to the status quo.” Insight, 4(35), 38–40, 38.
12.
Moore, J. W., and Grotheer, G. J., Jr. (1989). Moore's federal practice rules pamphlet. Part 1, Matthew Bender and Co., New York, N.Y., 114.
13.
O'Connell, J. (1989). “Less tortuous torts.” Best's Review, 89(12), 38–40.
14.
Sugarman, S. D. (1988). “Two proposals on tort reform.” Nat. Law J., 10(43), 13–16.
15.
“Survey data.” (1988). J. Kansas Bar Association, 57(3), 7–8.
16.
Sweet, J. (1985). Legal aspects of architecture, engineering, and the construction process, 3rd Ed., West Publishing Company, St. Paul, Minn., 325, 845.
17.
Tamarac v. Delamater, 234 Kan. 618, 622 (1984).
18.
“Tenth annual professional liability survey.” (1988). ACEC Liability Report, Amer. Consulting Engrs. Council, Washington, D.C.
19.
United States code annotated, 1989 supplement. (1989). West Publishing Company, St. Paul, Minn., Title 42, Section 9619, 175–180, 176.
20.
Wisker v. Hart, 244 Kan. 36, 43 (1988).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Volume 116 • Issue 3 • July 1990
Pages: 258 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1990
Published in print: Jul 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.