Estimating 7Q10 Confidence Limits from Data: A Bootstrap Approach
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 132, Issue 3
Abstract
7Q10 streamflow estimates used to support modeling and data analysis under the Clean Water Act national pollution discharge elimination system and total maximum daily load programs can have direct environmental and economic impacts. Thus it is important that 7Q10 streamflow always be reported together with confidence limits indicating the reliability of the estimate. In practice this is rarely done. This technical note presents a bootstrap approach for computing 7Q10 confidence limits from data and compares it to an empirical method. A case study using randomly selected subsets of data from five rivers in Idaho is used to evaluate the two methods. While both methods exhibit the expected increase in confidence interval as fewer years of data used, the bootstrap approach generally results in wider confidence intervals than does the empirical method. The opposite appears to be true in cases where fewer than of data are used or when the data are positively skewed. As most streamflow data are positively skewed short records, the bootstrap approach can generally be thought of as a more conservative means for estimating 7Q10 confidence intervals.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE) Task Committee on Low-Flow Evaluation, Methods, and Needs of the Committee on Surface-Water Hydrology of the Hydraulics Division. (1980). “Characteristics of low flows.” J. Hydraul. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 106(5), 717–731.
Chrysikopoulos, C. V., Hsuan, P., and Fyrillas, M. M. (2002). “Bootstrap estimation of the mass transfer coefficient of a dissolving nonaqueous phase liquid pool in porous media.” Water Resour. Res., 38(3), 1026.
Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Land and Water Quality (DEPLW). (2000). “St. George River Modeling report, final.” State of Maine. Rep. No. DEPLW2000-2, Augusta, Me.
Efron, B. (1979). “Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife.” Ann. Stat., 7, 1–26.
Federal Register. (1995). 60 (No. 56; March 23), 15418.
Federal Register. (1998). 63 (No. 129; July 7), 36792.
Kite, G. W. (1988). Frequency and risk analyses in hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colo.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). (1999). NPDES guidance manual, volume II, permitting version 8/6/99, Raleigh, N.C.
Rajagopalan, B., and Lall, U. (1999). “A nearest neighbor bootstrap for resampling daily precipitation and other weather variables.” Water Resour. Res., 35(10), 3089–3101.
Srinivas, V. V., and Srinivasan, K. (2005). “Hybrid moving block bootstrap for stochastic simulation of multi-site multi-season streamflows.” J. Hydrol., 302, 307–330.
Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC). (1998). “Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Rule Log No. 1998-055-307-WT.” Chapter 307, 48.
United States Department of the Interior. (1981). Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency, Office of Water Coordination. Bulletin 17B, Washington, D.C.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1997). Terms of environment: Glossary, abbreviations, and acronyms, EPA Office of Communications, Education, and Media Relations.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2005). “Total maximum daily loads: Examples of approved TMDLs.” ⟨http://www.epa.gov/owow/tmdl/examples/⟩.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 18, 2004
Accepted: Sep 14, 2005
Published online: May 1, 2006
Published in print: May 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.