Computer-Simulated Pedestrian Behavior in Shopping Environment
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 131, Issue 3
Abstract
There are as many distinct shopping itineraries in a shopping center as there are shoppers, at some level of discrimination; yet clear patterns of flow and volume can be observed in aggregate movement over the network of pathways. This paper tests the hypothesis that the aggregate pattern is a result of visitors operating according to simple movement heuristics. Itineraries are generated at seven entrances to a shopping mall according to four programmed heuristics. The results are aggregated by network segments and compared with observed itineraries. Generating movement toward stores according to their attraction, where attraction is defined by the size of the store, produces the best fit with actual behavior. Movement toward pathways with high connectivity also describes a significant proportion of the observed spatial behavior. Highly significant preferences are observed at the first and second choice points after the entrance. In general, microscale pedestrian choice in a shopping mall is systematic behavior and is visible in the aggregate itinerary data.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Brown, G. (1999). “Design and value: spatial form and the economic failure of a mall.” J. Shopping Center Res., 6(1), 83–120.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis, 2nd Ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
Gärling, T., and Gärling, E. (1988). “Distance minimization in downtown pedestrian shopping.” Envir. Plan. A, 20, 547–554.
Gärling, T., Selart, M., and Böök, A. (1997). “Investigating spatial choice and navigation in large-scale environments.” Handbook of spatial research paradigms and methodologies, N. Foreman and R. A. Gillett, eds., Vol. 1, 153–180.
Hoogendoorn, S. P. and Bovy, P. H. L. (2004). “Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 38(2), 169–190.
Huff, D. L., (1960). “A topographical model of consumer space preferences.” Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 6, 159–173.
Huff, D. L., (1964). “Defining and estimating a trading area.” J. Marketing, 28, 34–38.
Hughes, R. L., (2002). “A continuum theory for the flow of pedestrians.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 36, 507–535.
Mitchell, D. H. and MacGregor Smith, J. (2001). “Topological network design of pedestrian networks.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 35(2), 107–135.
Moe, W. W. (2003). “Buying, searching or browsing: differentiating between online shoppers using in-store navigational clickstream.” J. Consumer Psychol., 13(1–2), 29–39.
Moulin, B., and Kettani, I. (1998). “Route generation and description using a logical and an analogical framework.” Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 24(1/4), 155–179.
Okunuki, K., and Okabe, A. (2002). “Solving the Huff-based competitive location model on a network with link-based demand.” Ann. Operat. Res., 111(1–4), 239–252.
Zacharias, J. (2000). “Shopping behavior at the Alexis-Nihon Plaza in Montreal.” J. Shopping Center Res., 7(2), 67–79.
Zacharias, J. (2001). “Path choice and visual stimuli: signs of human activity and architecture.” J. Environ. Psychol., 21, 341–352.
Zacharias, J., and Schinazi, V. (2003). “The impact of an entertainment retrofit on the performance of a shopping center.” J. Shopping Center Res., 10(1), 29–44.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 1, 2004
Accepted: Sep 29, 2004
Published online: Sep 1, 2005
Published in print: Sep 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.