Technical Papers
May 14, 2024

Linkage amid Morphological Parameters and Erosion Rate Based on RUSLE for the Prioritization of Sutlej Catchment

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 4

Abstract

Quantification of basin characteristics from morphometric analysis helps understand the physical process of erosion. This study performed morphometric analysis and uses the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) on a pixel basis to estimate the space–time variability of soil loss in order to prioritize erosion-prone areas. The morphometric factors considered in the study included linear, areal, and relief aspects of the basin. Average annual soil loss was estimated using the RUSLE model for 21 years (1995–2005) and then used to correlate with morphometric parameters to find out the prioritization criteria for the Sutlej catchment. The Sutlej basin, covering an area of 21,595  km2, is a fifth-order dendritic drainage basin. Its mean bifurcation ratio is 4.06. Based on the values of morphological parameters, prioritization was being done for eight subwatersheds of the Sutlej basin. It was found that the average annual soil loss was strongly correlated with the time of concentration, drainage density, and texture ratio, but not with other morphological characteristics. The study suggested that indices based on morphometric parameters should not be preferred alone for prioritizing catchments prone to erosion. This research works shows the nexus between morphological parameters and their direct relationship with the erosion to prioritize the Sutlej catchment and its subwatersheds. Unlike previous applications, this integrated methodology not only enhances the accuracy of erosion risk evaluation but also addresses the limitations of relying solely on morphometric factors. The results reveal significant correlations between certain morphometric factors and soil loss, emphasizing the need for a multifactorial approach. Additionally, the present study contributes new insights into subwatershed prioritization for targeted erosion control efforts. These innovative findings advance the field by providing a more comprehensive and effective strategy for predicting and managing soil erosion in diverse geographical contexts. Correlation of morphological parameters with erosion rate based on RUSLE can play a significant role to prioritize the watersheds, which is not enough single handedly to demarcate the erosion-prone areas in the catchment for further treatment to conserve the soil loss in the respective region.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Aher, P. D., J. Adinarayana, and S. D. Gorantiwar. 2014. “Quantification of morphometric characterization and prioritization for management planning in semi-arid tropics of India: A remote sensing and GIS approach.” J. Hydrol. 511 (Apr): 850–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.028.
Ahmed, F., and K. S. Rao. 2015. “Geomorphometric analysis for estimation of sediment production rate and run-off in Tuirini watershed, Mizoram, India.” Int. J. Remote Sens. Appl. 5 (Apr): 67. https://doi.org/10.14355/ijrsa.2015.05.008.
Arunkumar, K. S., and S. Sherin. 2022. “Morphometric characteristics of a tropical River Basin, Central Kerala, India using geospatial techniques.” Landscape Environ. 16 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21120/LE/16/1/1.
Bhatt, S., and S. A. Ahmed. 2014. “Morphometric analysis to determine floods in the Upper Krishna basin using Cartosat DEM.” Geocarto Int. 29 (8): 878–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2013.868042.
Bhowmick, A., T. A. Yate, A. S. Shanka, B. S. Sandhar, S. K. Chaturvedi, and J. R. Ojha. 2023. “Delineation of ground water prospect zones of mojo watershed, Ethiopia, East Africa, using GIS, remote sensing and analytical hierarchy process.” J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 51 (11): 2265–2283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-023-01761-6.
Çadraku, H., and X. Hasa. 2023. “Morphometric analysis of Klina river basin using geospatial technology and open access datasets.” J. Water Land Dev. 58 (VII–IX): 31–41. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2023.145359.
Chauhan, R., J. C. Kuniyal, D. C. Pandey, and J. Jamwal. 2016. “The spatial analysis of Satluj Basin, Himachal Pradesh, India.” Int. Res. J. Earth Sci. 4 (7): 12.
Eze, E. B., and J. Efiong. 2010. “Morphometric parameters of the Calabar river basin: Implication for hydrologic processes.” J. Geogr. Geol. 2 (Mar): 18.
Farhan, Y., I. Elmaji, and O. Khalil. 2016. “GIS-based morphometric analysis of fourth-order sub-basins of the Zerqa river (Northern Jordan) using multivariate statistical techniques.” Nat. Resour. 7 (May): 461–480. https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2016.78040.
Gajbhiye, S., S. K. Mishra, and A. Pandey. 2014. “Prioritizing erosion-prone area through morphometric analysis: An RS and GIS perspective.” Appl. Water Sci. 4 (May): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0129-7.
Ganie, P. A., R. Posti, K. Kunal, G. Kunal, V. S. Bharti, V. K. Sehgal, D. Sarma, and P. K. Pandey. 2023. “Modelling of the Himalayan Mountain river basin through hydro-morphological and compound factor-based approaches using geoinformatics tools.” Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 9 (Feb): 3053–3084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01691-9.
Ghafari, H., M. Gorji, M. Arabkhedri, G. A. Roshani, A. Heidari, and S. Akhavan. 2017. “Identification and prioritization of critical erosion areas based on onsite and offsite effects.” CATENA 156 (Sep): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.03.014.
Gunjan, P., S. K. Mishra, A. K. Lohani, and S. K. Chandniha. 2020. “The study of morphological characteristics for best management practices over the Rampur watershed of Mahanadi River basin using prioritization.” J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 48 (May): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-019-01061-y.
Horton, R. E. 1932. “Drainage-basin characteristics.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 13 (1): 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR013i001p00350.
Horton, R. E. 1945. “Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology.” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 56 (May): 275. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2.
Kannan, R., S. Venkateswaran, M. Vijay Prabhu, and K. Sankar. 2018. “Drainage morphometric analysis of the Nagavathi watershed, Cauvery river basin in Dharmapuri district, Tamil Nadu, India using SRTM data and GIS.” Data Brief 19 (Aug): 2420–2426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.07.016.
Kant, C., G. Kumar, and R. S. Meena. 2023. “Modeling morphometric and geomorphological parameters of mountainous river basin for water resource management using remote sensing and GIS approach.” Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 9 (2): 2151–2163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01614-0.
Katiyar, R., P. K. Garg, and S. K. Jain. 2006. “Watershed prioritization and reservoir sedimentation using remote sensing data.” Geocarto Int. 21 (3): 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106040608542393.
Mahato, R., and G. Nimasow. 2023. “Morphometric analysis of Bichom River basin, Arunachal Pradesh, India using ALOS PALSAR RTC DEM and geospatial technology.” Appl. Geomat. 15 (May): 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-023-00528-5.
Miller, V. C. 1953. A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the clinch mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. New York: Dept. of Geology, Columbia Univ.
Mishra, A., S. Kar, and V. P. Singh. 2007. “Prioritizing structural management by quantifying the effect of land use and land cover on watershed runoff and sediment yield.” Water Resour. Manage. 21 (May): 1899–1913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9136-x.
Nag, S. K. 1998. “Morphometric analysis using remote sensing techniques in the Chaka sub-basin, Purulia district, West Bengal.” J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 26 (Mar): 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03007341.
Nongkynrih, J. M., and Z. Husain. 2011. “Morphometric analysis of the Manas river basin using earth observation data and Geographical Information System.” Int. J. Geomat. Geosci. 2 (2): 647–654.
Pandey, A., V. M. Chowdary, and B. C. Mal. 2007. “Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing.” Water Resour. Manage. 21 (Apr): 729–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9061-z.
Patel, D. P., C. A. Gajjar, and P. K. Srivastava. 2013. “Prioritization of Malesari mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis: A remote sensing and GIS perspective.” Environ. Earth Sci. 69 (8): 2643–2656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2086-0.
Ramu, C., B. Mahalingam, and P. Jayashree. 2013. “Morphometric analysis of Tungabhadra drainage basin in Karnataka using geographical information system.” J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2 (Jun): 1–7.
Rathore, C. S., M. Singh, M. Kothari, and K. K. Yadav. 2022. “Morphometric analysis of Bhesra Kalan micro-watershed using remote sensing and GIS technique.” Indian J. Ecol. 49 (1): 155–160. https://doi.org/10.55362/IJE/2022/3495.
Renard, K. G., D. C. Yoder, D. T. Lightle, and S. M. Dabney. 2011. “Universal soil loss equation and revised universal soil loss equation.” In Handbook of erosion modeling, edited by R. P. C. Morgan and M. A. Nearing, 135–167. New York: Wiley.
Schumm, S. A. 1956. “Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey.” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 67 (5): 597–646. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2.
Schumm, S. A. 1963. “Sinuosity of alluvial rivers on the Great Plains.” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 74 (9): 1089–1100. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1963)74[1089:SOAROT]2.0.CO;2.
Sharma, P. D., A. K. Goel, and R. S. Minhas. 1991. “Water and sediment yields into the Sutlej river from the high Himalaya.” Mt. Res. Dev. 11 (May): 87. https://doi.org/10.2307/3673569.
Sharma, S. K., S. Gajbhiye, and S. Tignath. 2015. “Application of principal component analysis in grouping geomorphic parameters of a watershed for hydrological modeling.” Appl. Water Sci. 5 (May): 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0170-1.
Shivhare, N., A. K. Rahul, P. J. Omar, M. S. Chauhan, S. Gaur, P. K. S. Dikshit, and S. B. Dwivedi. 2018. “Identification of critical soil erosion prone areas and prioritization of micro-watersheds using geoinformatics techniques.” Ecol. Eng. 121 (Oct): 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.09.004.
Singh, J., V. Singh, C. S. P. Ojha, and M. K. Arora. 2023. “Assessment of recent changes (2011–2020) in glacier thickness and runoff variability in Gangotri glacier, India.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 68 (15): 2223–2242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2023.2258861.
Somashekar, R. K., P. Ravikumar, S. V. Sowmya, M. A. Dar, and A. S. Ravikumar. 2011. “Runoff estimation and morphometric analysis for Hesaraghatta watershed using IRS–1D LISS III FCC satellite data.” J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 39 (Mar): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0074-6.
Strahler, A. N. 1952a. “Dynamic basis of geomorphology.” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 63 (May): 923. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[923:DBOG]2.0.CO;2.
Strahler, A. N. 1952b. “Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography.” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 63 (11): 1117–1142. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[1117:HAAOET]2.0.CO;2.
Strahler, A. N. 1954. “Statistical analysis in geomorphic research.” J. Geol. 62 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/626131.
Vishwas, P. 2023. “Quantitative evaluation of drainage attributes to infer hydrologic and morphological characteristics of upper Beas Basin, Himachal Pradesh: A GIS-based approach.” Geol. Ecol. Landscapes 7 (3): 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2021.1952766.
Waikar, M. L., and A. P. Nilawar. 2014. “Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin using geographical information system: A case study.” Int. J. Multidiscip. Curr. Res. 2 (2014): 179–184.
Wischmeier, W. H., and D. D. Smith. 1958. “Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 39 (2): 285. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR039i002p00285.
Withanage, N. S., and G. D. J. M. Abeysekara. 2023. “Watershed management prioritization in paddy land uses: A case study in Hungamala Ela sub-watershed of Mahaweli River Basin of Sri Lanka.” J. Geospatial Surv. 3 (1): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.4038/jgs.v3i1.48.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 150Issue 4August 2024

History

Received: Sep 3, 2023
Accepted: Feb 12, 2024
Published online: May 14, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 14, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2924-6827. Email: [email protected]
C. S. P. Ojha, F.ASCE [email protected]
Supervisor and Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. Email: [email protected]
Vijay P. Singh, P.E., Hon.D.WRE, P.H., Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Distinguished Professor and Regents Professor, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, and Zarchy Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share