Technical Papers
May 22, 2023

Development of a Geomechanics Program for Wellbore Stability Analysis

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23, Issue 8

Abstract

A geomechanics program for wellbore stability analysis has been developed consisting of two modules: an analytical-based solution and a numerical-based solution. In the first part, input data are imported, including petrophysical well logs, pressure data, formation well tops, and a well path. Lithology intervals are set with proper prediction equations to calculate rock mechanical properties based on laboratory tests. In-situ stress and pore pressure are determined using different methods, including the poroelastic plane strain model and stress polygon. From the theory of plane strain, new equations are solved to determine horizontal tectonic strains (εh,εH) from drilling events such as total mud loss and breakout during drilling. Safe mud weight bounds are calculated through depth and in different azimuths and inclinations applying the Mohr–Coulomb and the Mogi–Coulomb failure criteria. The latter underestimated the minimum mud weight to prevent wellbore breakout. The transversely vertical isotropy of shale formation is programmed with multiple stress transformations via the weak-plane method. In the second module, a 3D model around the wellbore is discretized with hexahedral eight-point elements and programmed using the finite-element (FE) method. Rock mechanical property and displacement boundary conditions are applied to solve FE equations. Stress from the numerical model matched to the Kirsch model and results show that maximum stress concentration around the wellbore corresponds to the wellbore breakout, which has analytically been established. A new well plan across the 3D model was examined to obtain the safe mud weight bounds and results were in agreement with the analytical calculations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The following Matlab codes of this program are available upon request from the corresponding author: Geomechanical_Properties.m, Insitu_Stress.m, MC_MW_MultipleDepth.m, MC_MW_SingleDepth.m, Petrophysics.m, SHmax_Stress_Polygon.m, Shear_Velocity.m, Petrophysics.m, Parameters.m, Input_Calc_Model_Parameters.m, Fracture_Slip.m, and read_las.m.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to greatly thank the Iranian Offshore Oil Company for providing well data, laboratory tests, facilities, and opportunity for this research.

References

Al-Ajmi, A. M., and R. W. Zimmerman. 2006. “Stability analysis of vertical wellbores using the Mogi–Coulomb failure criterion.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 43: 1200–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.04.001.
Ameen, M. S., B. G. D. Smart, J. M. Somerville, S. Hammilton, and N. A. Naji. 2009. “Predicting rock mechanical properties of carbonates from wireline logs (A case study: Arab-D reservoir, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia).” Mar. Pet. Geol. 26: 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.01.017.
Asaka, M., and R. M. Holt. 2021. “Anisotropic wellbore stability analysis: Impact on failure prediction.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 54: 583–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02283-0.
Azadpour, M., N. ShadManaman, A. Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi, and M.-R. Sedghipour. 2015. “Pore pressure prediction and modeling using well-logging data in one of the gas fields in south of Iran.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 128: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.02.022.
Bowers, G. L. 1995. “Pore pressure estimation from velocity data: Accounting for overpressure mechanisms besides undercompaction.” SPE Drill. Complet 10: 89–95. https://doi.org/10.2118/27488-PA.
Bradley, W. B. 1979. “Failure of inclined boreholes.” J. Energy Res. Technol. 101: 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3446925.
Chen, M., Y. Jin, and G. Q. Zhang. 2008. Petroleum related rock mechanics. Beijing: Science Press.
Eaton, B. A. 1975. “The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs.” In Proc., Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME. SPE 5544. Dallas, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).
Eissa, E. A., and A. Kazi. 1988. “Relation between static and dynamic young’s moduli of rocks.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 25: 479–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(88)90987-4.
Elkatatny, S., M. Mahmoud, I. Mohamed, and A. Abdulraheem. 2018. “Development of a new correlation to determine the static Young’s modulus.” J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 8: 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-017-0316-4.
Elyasi, A., and K. Goshtasbi. 2015. “Numerical modeling of the stability of horizontal multidrain oil wells.” China Ocean Eng. 29: 719–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-015-0075-2.
Fjaer, E., R. M. Holt, P. Horsrud, A. M. Raaen, and R. Risnes. 2008. Petroleum related rock mechanics. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier.
Ghoreishian Amiri, S. A., S. A. Sadrnejad, and H. Ghasemzadeh. 2017. “A hybrid numerical model for multiphase fluid flow in a deformable porous medium.” Appl. Math. Modell. 45: 881–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.01.042.
Gutierrez, M. A., N. R. Braunsdore, and B. A. Couzens. 2006. “Calibration and ranking of pore-pressure prediction models.” Leading Edge 25: 1516–1523. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2405337.
Hawkes, C. D., S. P. Simth, and P. J. McLellan. 2002. “Coupled modeling of borehole instability and multiphase flow for underbalanced drilling.” In Proc., of IADC/SPE Drilling Conf. SPE-74447-MS. Dallas, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).
Horsrud, P. 2001. “Estimating mechanical properties of shale from empirical correlations society of petroleum engineers.” SPE Drill. Complet 16 (2): 68–73. https://doi.org/10.2118/56017-pa.
ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics). 2007. “The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006.” In Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods, edited by R. Ulusay, and J. A. Hudson, 57–94. Ankara, Turkey: ISRM, Compilation Arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group.
Jaeger, J. C. 1960. “Shear failure of anistropic rocks.” Geol. Mag. 97 (1): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800061100.
Jaeger, J. C., N. G. W. Cook, and R. W. Zimmerman. 2007. Fundamentals of rock mechanics. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
Kidambi, T., and G. S. Kumar. 2016. “Mechanical Earth Modeling for a vertical well drilled in a naturally fractured tight carbonate gas reservoir in the Persian Gulf.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 141: 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.01.003.
Kirsch. 1898. “Die Theorie der Elastizität und die Bedürfnisse der Festigkeitslehre.” Zeitschrift des Vereines deutscher Ingenieure 42: 797–807.
Lee, H., S. H. Ong, M. Azeemuddin, and H. Goodman. 2012. “A wellbore stability model for formations with anisotropic rock strengths.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 96–97: 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.08.010.
Leseikin, V. D. 2010. Grid generation methods. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.
Li, B., R. C. K. Wong, B. Xu, and B. Yang. 2018. “Comprehensive stability analysis of an inclined wellbore embedded in Colorado shale formation for thermal recovery.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 110: 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.07.019.
Li, X., C. Zhang, Y. Feng, Y. Wei, X. Chen, H. Weng, and J. Deng. 2022. “An integrated geomechanics approach to evaluate and manage wellbore stability in a deep graben formation in Tarim basin.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 208: 109391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109391.
Liu, X., W. Zeng, L. Liang, and M. Lei. 2016. “Wellbore stability analysis for horizontal wells in shale formations.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 31: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.061.
Logan, D. L. 2012. A first course in the finite element method. 5th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Ma, T., and P. Chen. 2015. “A wellbore stability analysis model with chemical-mechanical coupling for shale gas reservoirs.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 26: 72–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.05.028.
MathWorks. 2009 Discover the latest MATLAB and simulink capabilities at MATLAB EXPO 2023. Natick, MA: MathWorks.
Molaghab, A., M. H. Taherynia, S. M. Fatemi Aghda, and A. Fahmifar. 2017. “Determination of minimum and maximum stress profiles using wellbore failure evidences: A case study—a deep oil well in the southwest of Iran.” J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 7: 707–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-017-0323-5.
Morley, C. K., R. King, R. Hillis, M. Tingay, and G. Backe. 2011. “Deepwater fold and thrust belt classification, tectonics, structure and hydrocarbon prospectivity: A review.” Earth-Sci. Rev. 104: 41–91.
Setiawan, N. B., and R. W. Zimmerman. 2018. “Wellbore breakout prediction in transversely isotropic rocks using true-triaxial failure criteria.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 112: 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.10.033.
Tingay, M. R. P., R. R. Hillis, R. E. Swarbrick, C. K. Morley, and A. R. Damit. 2009. “Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province, Brunei.” AAPG Bull. 93 (1): 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1306/08080808016.
Wu, B., S. K. Choi, and C. P. Tan. 2005. “Effect of stress anisotropic on cavity strength and implications in wellbore stability and sand production analyses. Alaska Rocks 2005.” In Proc., 40th U.S. Symp. On Rock Mechanics. Anchorage, AK: USRMS.
Xu, S. S., A. F. Neito-Samaniego, and S. A. Alaniz-Alvarez. 2010. “3D mohr diagram to explain reactivation of pre-existing planes due to changes in applied stresses.” In Rock stress and earthquakes, 38–85. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Zhang, J. 2011. “Pore pressure prediction from well logs: Methods, modifications, and new approaches.” Earth Sci. Rev. 108: 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.06.001.
Zoback, M. D. 2007. Reservoir geomechanics. New York: Cambridge.
Zoback, M. D., C. A. Barton, M. Brudy, D. A. Castillo, T. Finkbeiner, B. R. Grollimund, D. B. Moos, P. Peska, C. D. Ward, and D. J. Wiprut. 2003. “Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40: 1049–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.07.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23Issue 8August 2023

History

Received: Dec 21, 2022
Accepted: Feb 28, 2023
Published online: May 22, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 22, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Omid Saeidi [email protected]
Geomechanics Dept., Iranian Offshore Oil Company, Tehran, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Amin Rahimi Dalkhani [email protected]
Dept. of Geoscience and Engineering, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, Netherlands. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share