Technical Papers
Mar 27, 2024

Toward Sustainable Construction: Optimizing Carbon Emission Reduction in the Building Supply Chain through Game-Theoretic Strategies, Government Subsidies, and Cost-Sharing Contract

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 6

Abstract

Carbon emission reduction (CER) in the construction industry can aid in achieving the international community’s carbon neutrality target. However, the low motivation of construction enterprises to reduce carbon emissions and the unsatisfactory effect of CER are still unresolved issues. This study aims to address these issues by constructing a building supply chain (BSC) consisting of a developer and a contractor using government subsidies and cost-sharing contracts. The optimal government subsidy and feedback equilibrium strategies of the BSC are examined using a combination of differential game theory and numerical simulations. The findings demonstrate that (1) cost-sharing contracts may enhance developer and contractor profits and building CER, goodwill, and demand without relying on government subsidies; (2) when subsidized by the government, each equilibrium strategy meets or exceeds the performance of the centralized model, with the cost-sharing contract having a negligible effect on the enhancement of each equilibrium strategy; and (3) both the game structure and the positioning of construction enterprises in the BSC are connected to the number of government subsidies. The city of Shenzhen, one of China’s first low-carbon pilot cities, provides a realistic environment for the simulation analysis, with the Block K residential building in Nanshan District serving as a case study. Furthermore, this work contributes to the body of knowledge by proposing a novel CER model for the BSC using differential game theory. The research provides new insights into the role of government subsidies in shaping profit distribution, game structure, and enterprise positioning. Findings demonstrate the value of cost-sharing contracts in improving CER, goodwill, demand, and profits when implemented collaboratively. This advances the theoretical understanding of incentives and strategies for promoting CER in construction.

Practical Applications

This research highlights the importance of collaborative efforts between the government and the building supply chain (BSC) to promote sustainable construction and carbon emission reduction (CER). The study found that government subsidies can be an effective tool to encourage developers and contractors to adopt CER practices. However, relying solely on subsidies is insufficient—collaboration through mechanisms such as cost-sharing contracts can further enhance sustainability outcomes when enterprises work together. To facilitate low-carbon construction, the government could provide subsidies for developers’ promotional and marketing activities as well as funding for contractors’ research and development of sustainable materials and technologies. Financial incentives such as tax breaks and preferential lending for potential homebuyers can also accelerate consumer demand. Ultimately, creating a supportive environment where enterprises proactively pursue CER creates a win–win situation where the BSC becomes more sustainable while firms improve their branding and profitability. The insights from this research highlight the need for a multipronged approach. Governments play a key role through policy and financial support. Realizing the full potential of sustainable construction also requires active participation from developers, contractors, and consumers. By outlining optimal strategies and incentives, this study provides valuable guidance to construction industry stakeholders seeking to implement CER collaboratively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by British Council Newton Fund Researcher Links 2020 (2019-RLWK11-10521)

References

Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., A. Hatami-Marbini, N. M. Moazed, M. Ansari, and A. A. Abbasi Kamardi. 2021. “Differential game approach to pricing and advertising decisions.” Oper. Res. Lett. 49 (5): 688–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2021.07.002.
Arıoğlu Akan, M. Ö., D. G. Dhavale, and J. Sarkis. 2017. “Greenhouse gas emissions in the construction industry: An analysis and evaluation of a concrete supply chain.” J. Cleaner Prod. 167 (Nov): 1195–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.225.
Badi, S., and N. Murtagh. 2019. “Green supply chain management in construction: A systematic literature review and future research agenda.” J. Cleaner Prod. 223 (Jun): 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.132.
Bai, Q., J. Xu, and S. S. Chauhan. 2020. “Effects of sustainability investment and risk aversion on a two-stage supply chain coordination under a carbon tax policy.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 142 (Apr): 106324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106324.
Beauregard, S., S. Hoque, P. Fisette, and B. Weil. 2014. “Is Boston building better? An analysis of the LEED certifiable standard in the Boston zoning code.” J. Green Build. 9 (3): 131–150. https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618-9.3.131.
Begum, R. A., C. Siwar, J. J. Pereira, and A. H. Jaafar. 2006. “A benefit–cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: The case of Malaysia.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 48 (1): 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.01.004.
Berrang-Ford, L., et al. 2021. “A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change.” Nat. Clim. Change 11 (11): 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01170-y.
Bertinelli, L., C. Camacho, and B. Zou. 2014. “Carbon capture and storage and transboundary pollution: A differential game approach.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 237 (2): 721–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.025.
Bohari, A. A. M., M. Skitmore, B. Xia, M. Teo, and N. Khalil. 2020. “Key stakeholder values in encouraging green orientation of construction procurement.” J. Cleaner Prod. 270 (Oct): 122246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122246.
Cao, K., X. Xu, Q. Wu, and Q. Zhang. 2017. “Optimal production and carbon emission reduction level under cap-and-trade and low carbon subsidy policies.” J. Cleaner Prod. 167 (Nov): 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.251.
Chen, Y.-S. 2008. “The driver of green innovation and green image–green core competence.” J. Bus. Ethics 81 (3): 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1.
Dadhich, P., A. Genovese, N. Kumar, and A. Acquaye. 2015. “Developing sustainable supply chains in the UK construction industry: A case study.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (Jun): 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.012.
Deng, Y., D. You, and Y. Zhang. 2021. “Research on improvement strategies for low-carbon technology innovation based on a differential game: The perspective of tax competition.” Sustainable Prod. Consumption 26 (Apr): 1046–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.007.
Dong, Y. H., and S. T. Ng. 2015. “A life cycle assessment model for evaluating the environmental impacts of building construction in Hong Kong.” Build. Environ. 89 (Jul): 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.020.
Esmaeili-Najafabadi, E., M. S. Fallah Nezhad, H. Pourmohammadi, M. Honarvar, and M. A. Vahdatzad. 2019. “A joint supplier selection and order allocation model with disruption risks in centralized supply chain.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 127 (Jan): 734–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.017.
Fu, D., C. M. Ionescu, E.-H. Aghezzaf, and R. De Keyser. 2014. “Decentralized and centralized model predictive control to reduce the bullwhip effect in supply chain management.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 73 (Jul): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.04.003.
Ghosh, D., and J. Shah. 2015. “Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (Jun): 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.005.
Ho, C. S., Y. Matsuoka, J. Simson, and K. Gomi. 2013. “Low carbon urban development strategy in Malaysia—The case of Iskandar Malaysia development corridor.” Habitat Int. 37 (Jan): 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.018.
Hong, J., Q. Shen, and F. Xue. 2016. “A multi-regional structural path analysis of the energy supply chain in China’s construction industry.” Energy Policy 92 (May): 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.017.
Jiang, K., D. You, Z. Li, and S. Shi. 2019. “A differential game approach to dynamic optimal control strategies for watershed pollution across regional boundaries under eco-compensation criterion.” Ecol. Indic. 105 (May): 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.065.
Koskela, L. 1992. Application of the new production philosophy to construction. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Lee, S.-H., and C.-H. Park. 2021. “Environmental regulations in private and mixed duopolies: Taxes on emissions versus green R&D subsidies.” Econ. Syst. 45 (1): 100852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100852.
Li, T., R. Zhang, S. Zhao, and B. Liu. 2019. “Low carbon strategy analysis under revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contracts.” J. Cleaner Prod. 212 (Mar): 1462–1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.282.
Liang, L., and L. Futou. 2020. “Differential game modelling of joint carbon reduction strategy and contract coordination based on low-carbon reference of consumers.” J. Cleaner Prod. 277 (Dec): 123798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123798.
Liu, G., H. Yang, and R. Dai. 2020. “Which contract is more effective in improving product greenness under different power structures: Revenue sharing or cost sharing?” Comput. Ind. Eng. 148 (Oct): 106701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106701.
Liu, Z., Q. Qian, B. Hu, W.-L. Shang, L. Li, Y. Zhao, Z. Zhao, and C. Han. 2022. “Government regulation to promote coordinated emission reduction among enterprises in the green supply chain based on evolutionary game analysis.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 182 (Jul): 106290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106290.
Ma, C., H. Yang, W. Zhang, and S. Huang. 2021. “Low-carbon consumption with government subsidy under asymmetric carbon emission information.” J. Cleaner Prod. 318 (Oct): 128423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128423.
Ma, M., and W. Cai. 2018. “What drives the carbon mitigation in Chinese commercial building sector? Evidence from decomposing an extended Kaya identity.” Sci. Total Environ. 634 (Sep): 884–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.043.
Ma, M., W. Cai, and Y. Wu. 2019. “China Act on the Energy Efficiency of Civil Buildings (2008): A decade review.” Sci. Total Environ. 651 (Feb): 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.118.
Mahmoudi, R., and M. Rasti-Barzoki. 2018. “Sustainable supply chains under government intervention with a real-world case study: An evolutionary game theoretic approach.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 116 (Feb): 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.12.028.
Marc, N., and J. A. Kenneth. 1962. “Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions.” Economica 29 (114): 129–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/2551549.
Mohsin, A. K. M., S. Far Abid Hossain, H. Tushar, M. M. Iqbal, and A. Hossain. 2021. “Differential game model and coordination model for green supply chain based on green technology research and development.” Heliyon 7 (8): e07811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07811.
Mojumder, A., and A. Singh. 2021. “An exploratory study of the adaptation of green supply chain management in construction industry: The case of Indian Construction Companies.” J. Cleaner Prod. 295 (May): 126400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126400.
Nelms, C., A. Russell, and B. Lence. 2005. “Assessing the performance of sustainable technologies for building projects.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 32 (1): 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1139/l04-102.
Peng, H., and Y. Liu. 2018. “How government subsidies promote the growth of entrepreneurial companies in clean energy industry: An empirical study in China.” J. Cleaner Prod. 188 (Jul): 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.126.
Plambeck, E. L. 2012. “Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through operations and supply chain management.” Energy Econ. 34 (Nov): S64–S74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.031.
Sheu, J.-B. 2011. “Bargaining framework for competitive green supply chains under governmental financial intervention.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 47 (5): 573–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2010.12.006.
Silva, R. V., J. de Brito, and R. K. Dhir. 2017. “Availability and processing of recycled aggregates within the construction and demolition supply chain: A review.” J. Cleaner Prod. 143 (Feb): 598–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.070.
Song, X., M. Shen, Y. Lu, L. Shen, and H. Zhang. 2021. “How to effectively guide carbon reduction behavior of building owners under emission trading scheme? An evolutionary game-based study.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 90 (Sep): 106624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106624.
Subramanyam, V., M. Ahiduzzaman, and A. Kumar. 2017. “Greenhouse gas emissions mitigation potential in the commercial and institutional sector.” Energy Build. 140 (Apr): 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.007.
Wang, C., W. Wang, and R. Huang. 2017. “Supply chain enterprise operations and government carbon tax decisions considering carbon emissions.” J. Cleaner Prod. 152 (May): 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.051.
Wang, M., Y. Li, Z. Cheng, C. Zhong, and W. Ma. 2021a. “Evolution and equilibrium of a green technological innovation system: Simulation of a tripartite game model.” J. Cleaner Prod. 278 (Jan): 123944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123944.
Wang, M., Y. Li, M. Li, W. Shi, and S. Quan. 2019. “Will carbon tax affect the strategy and performance of low-carbon technology sharing between enterprises?” J. Cleaner Prod. 210 (Feb): 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.321.
Wang, W., S. Hao, W. He, and M. A. Mohamed. 2022. “Carbon emission reduction decisions in construction supply chain based on differential game with government subsidies.” Build Environ. 222 (Aug): 109149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109149.
Wang, Y., X. Xu, and Q. Zhu. 2021b. “Carbon emission reduction decisions of supply chain members under cap-and-trade regulations: A differential game analysis.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 162 (Dec): 107711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107711.
Wei, J., and C. Wang. 2021. “Improving interaction mechanism of carbon reduction technology innovation between supply chain enterprises and government by means of differential game.” J. Cleaner Prod. 296 (May): 126578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126578.
Xia, X., J. Ruan, Z. Juan, Y. Shi, X. Wang, and F. T. S. Chan. 2018. “Upstream-downstream joint carbon reduction strategies based on low-carbon promotion.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (7): 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071351.
Xie, J., L. Liang, L. Liu, and P. Ieromonachou. 2017. “Coordination contracts of dual-channel with cooperation advertising in closed-loop supply chains.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 183 (Jan): 528–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.026.
Xu, J., and S. Zhao. 2017. “Noncooperative game-based equilibrium strategy to address the conflict between a construction company and selected suppliers.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (8): 04017051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001329.
Yang, X., L. He, Y. Xia, and Y. Chen. 2019. “Effect of government subsidies on renewable energy investments: The threshold effect.” Energ Policy 132 (Sep): 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.039.
Yin, S., B. Li, and Z. Xing. 2019. “The governance mechanism of the building material industry (BMI) in transformation to green BMI: The perspective of green building.” Sci. Total Environ. 677 (Aug): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.317.
Yuan, B., and Y. Zhang. 2020. “Flexible environmental policy, technological innovation and sustainable development of China’s industry: The moderating effect of environment regulatory enforcement.” J. Cleaner Prod. 243 (Jan): 118543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118543.
Zhang, S., C. Wang, and C. Yu. 2019. “The evolutionary game analysis and simulation with system dynamics of manufacturer’s emissions abatement behavior under cap-and-trade regulation.” Appl. Math. Comput. 355 (Aug): 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.02.080.
Zhao, D., C. Xu, and Q. Wang. 2014. “Differential strategies of joint emission reductions and low-carbon promotion considering competing retailers.” Control Decis. 29 (10): 1809–1815. https://doi.org/10.13195/j.kzyjc.2013.1000.
Zhao, D.-Z., B.-Y. Yuan, and C.-Q. Xu. 2016. “Dynamic coordination strategy of vertical cooperative on carbon emission reduction in supply chain under low-carbon era.” J. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manage. 30 (1): 147–154. https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2016.01.018.
Zhao, L., Z. Tian, and Y. Yang. 2020. “Research on building supply chain collaboration model based on BIM and internet of things technology and its application.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 455 (1): 012203. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/455/1/012203.
Zhou, Y., and X. Ye. 2018. “Differential game model of joint emission reduction strategies and contract design in a dual-channel supply chain.” J. Cleaner Prod. 190 (Jul): 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.133.
Zu, Y., L. Chen, and Y. Fan. 2018. “Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game.” J. Cleaner Prod. 177 (Mar): 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.220.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 6June 2024

History

Received: Oct 25, 2022
Accepted: Jan 5, 2024
Published online: Mar 27, 2024
Published in print: Jun 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Aug 27, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Senior Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan Univ., Qinhuangdao 066000, China. Email: [email protected]
Shaojie Hao [email protected]
Postgraduate Student, School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan Univ., Qinhuangdao 066000, China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of the Built Environment and Architecture, London South Bank Univ., 103 Borough Rd., London SE1 0AA, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9604-4523. Email: [email protected]
Engineer, Research Institute of Standards and Norms, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Beijing 10010, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share