Determining What Next to Automate in the Development of Smart Contracts in Construction: Five Principles for Guiding Incremental Change
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 3
Abstract
Existing research on smart contracts in construction primarily concentrates on their operational stage and the mechanics of their potential operation. The response to the question “Can we do it?” is a resounding yes. The next question to answer is “How do we do it?” The answer to this question involves a consideration of the adoption of smart contracts and their synthesis with the entire construction process, from procurement to the in-use phase. Particular attention is needed for integration into complementary and receptive working practices resulting in optimum conditions for adoption. The current risk is that smart contract adoption may suffer from a lack of clear guidance and occur on a piecemeal and ad hoc basis. This study proposes a principled approach to counter this risk. This approach has been seen before in construction law in the form of the Abrahamson principles, which are a seminal reference point in any discussion of construction law. A framework is proposed, based on five key principles, to guide the automation of contract terms, highlighting the importance of control, codifiability, consideration, efficiency, and data access. The approach uses an interdisciplinary methodology with an applied professional constituency to promote law reform–based research. The inductive/deductive approach aims to share insights with the hope that the resulting principles will aid in the incremental implementation of smart contracts in the industry.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.
References
List of Cases
MT Hojgaard A/S v E.ON [2017] UKSC 59 BLR 477.
Trant v Mott MacDonald [2017] EWHC 2061 (TCC).
Works Cited
Abrahamson, M. W. 1983. “Risk management.” Int. Constr. Law Rev. 1: 241–244.
Al Khalil, F., T. Butler, L. O’Brien, and M. Ceci. 2017. “Trust in smart contracts is a process, as well.” In Financial cryptography and data security, 510–519. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70278-0_32.
Amara, R. 2006. The Age, 31 October 2006, Oxford essential quotations, edited by S. Ratcliffe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Arthurs, H. 1983. Law and learning report. Ottawa: Consultative Group on Research and Education in Law.
Azungah, T. 2018. “Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis.” Qual. Res. J. 18 (4): 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035.
Blaikie, N. 2000. Designing social research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Polity Press.
Brook, N. 2018. The advantages of parametric insurance market insight. London: Clyde & Co.
Chynoweth, P. 2007. “Changing times for built environment legal scholarship.” Struct. Surv. 25 (3–4): 11025. https://doi.org/10.1108/ss.2007.11025caa.001.
Daye, J. 2022. “Our artefacts our stories.” Accessed August 1, 2023. https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/news/our-artefacts-our-stories.
Di Giuda, G. M., P. E. Giana, and G. Pattini. 2020. “The shortening and the automation of payments: The potentiality of smart contract in the AECO sector.” In Proc., Int. Structural Engineering and Construction, 1–6. London: ISEC Press.
Farmer, M. 2016. “The farmer review of the UK construction labour market: Modernise or die.” In Construction leadership council. London: Dept. for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
Hackitt, J. 2018. “Independent review of building regulations and fire safety.” In Parliament by the secretary of state for housing, communities and local government by command of her majesty. London: Dept. of Housing, Communities and Local Government.
Lamb, K. 2018. Blockchain and smart contracts: What the AEC sector needs to know. Cambridge, UK: Centre for Digital Build Britain.
Latham, S. M. 1994. Constructing the team. London: HM Stationery Office.
Mason, J. 2017. “Intelligent contracts and the construction industry.” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resoluti. Eng. Constr. 9 (3): 04517012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000233.
Mason, J. 2022. Innovating construction law: Towards the digital age. London: Routledge.
McNamara, A. J., and S. M. Sepasgozar. 2021. “Intelligent contract adoption in the construction industry: Concept development.” In Automation in construction, 103452. New York: Elsevier.
Mosey, D. 2021. Constructing the gold standard: An independent review of public sector construction frameworks. London: UK Cabinet Office.
Msawil, M., D. Greenwood, and M. Kassem. 2022. “A systematic evaluation of blockchain-enabled contract administration in construction projects.” Autom. Constr. 143 (Nov): 104553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104553.
Ozkan, E., N. Azizi, and O. Haass. 2021. “Leveraging smart contract in project procurement through DLT to gain sustainable competitive advantages.” Sustainability 13 (23): 13380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313380.
Penzes, B. 2018. Blockchain technology in construction. London: Institution of Civil Engineers.
Rogers, E. 1962. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Saxon, R. 2013. Growth through BIM. London: Construction Industry Council.
Sonmez, R., S. Ahmadisheykhsarmast, and A. A. Güngör. 2022. “BIM integrated smart contract for construction project progress payment administration.” Autom. Constr. 139 (Sep): 104294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104294.
Steinert, M., and L. Leifer. 2010. Scrutinizing Gartner’s hype cycle approach, 13. Portland, OR: Business, Environmental Science PICMET 2010 Technology Management for Global Economic Growth.
Susskind, R., and D. Susskind. 2022. The future of the professions. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Szabo, N. 1997. Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. Chicago: First Monday.
Tebbit, M. 2005. Philosophy of law: An introduction. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 6, 2023
Accepted: Jan 1, 2024
Published online: Mar 29, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Aug 29, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.