Scholarly Papers
Feb 28, 2024

Risk Allocation and Mitigation Practices for Building Information Modeling: Addressing Legal and Contractual Risks Associated with Contract Documentation

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 2

Abstract

In recent years, the adoption of building information modeling (BIM) has gained significant traction in the construction industry, but its rapid proliferation has also raised concerns about potential risks and challenges associated with its implementation. Although effective risk allocation and mitigation are essential for the successful implementation of BIM in construction projects, there is a notable knowledge gap in this area. Effectively allocating and managing legal and contractual risks in BIM projects can help minimize disputes or any financial and time losses. This article examines various risks associated with BIM contract documentation. Drawing on the theory of risk allocation, the research reported in this article discusses key principles and the most suitable practices for risk allocation and mitigation in the context of BIM contract documentation. According to the findings, most of the risk factors can be avoided if they can be predicted early from the initiation phase of the project, and properly allocated and mitigated in a transparent contract agreement. Based on in-depth interviews with 19 European experts mostly practicing as professional consultants, the research identifies how the BIM risks associated with the contract documentation can be allocated among different project stakeholders, such as clients, designers, contractors, and subcontractors, through contractual provisions and other risk management strategies. This study mainly focuses on projects delivered in a design bid build (DBB) method as it is one of the dominant procurement methods in Europe. By adhering to proper risk allocation and mitigation practices based on the theory of risk allocation, stakeholders in BIM-enabled projects can manage and assign legal and contractual risks in a more effective manner to the party who is more capable of handling the risks and eventually enhance project success.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are sincerely grateful to the reviewers of this paper and their feedback. Moreover, we would like to sincerely thank Prof. Dr. EM. Evelien Bruggeman for her support during the research data collection, it would not have been possible without her help. Additionally, we should express our special thanks to The University of Melbourne for funding this research project.

References

Works Cited

Abdel Aziz, A. M. 2007. “Successful delivery of public-private partnerships for infrastructure development.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (12): 918–931. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:12(918).
Abd Jamil, A. H., and M. S. Fathi. 2019. “Contractual issues for building information modelling (BIM)-based construction projects: An exploratory case study.” In Vol. 513 of Proc., IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 012035. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.
Abd Jamil, A. H., and M. S. Fathi. 2020. “Enhancing BIM-based information interoperability: Dispute resolution from legal and contractual perspectives.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (7): 05020007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001868.
Abrahamson, M. 1973. “Contractual risks in tunnelling: How they should be shared.” Tunnels Tunneling 5 (6): 587–598.
Abrahamson, M. W. 1984. “Risk management.” In The international construction law review, 241–264. London: Atkin Chambers.
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2013a. “AIA contract documents-G202-2013 project BIM protocol.” Accessed April 2, 2023. https://www.aiacontracts.org/contract-documents/19016-project-bim-protocol.
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2013b. Document E203TM-2013 building information modeling and digital data exhibit. Washington, DC: AIA.
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2023. “AIA contract documents.” Accessed April 12, 2023. https://aiacontracts.com/.
Aibinu, A. 2015. “Building information modelling implementation in practice: Lessons learned from a housing project in the Netherlands.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Structural Engineering and Construction Management 2015, 77–83. Moratuwa, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuwa.
Aibinu, A. A., and E. Papadonikolaki. 2020. “Conceptualizing and operationalizing team task interdependences: BIM implementation assessment using effort distribution analytics.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 38 (5): 420–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1623409.
Almarri, K., M. Aljarman, and H. Boussabaine. 2019. “Emerging contractual and legal risks from the application of building information modelling.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (10): 2307–2325. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2018-0224.
Alwee, S. N. A. S., H. Salleh, and U. K. Zulkifli. 2021. “Strategic process protocol for building information modeling (BIM) contract administration in Malaysia: A concept paper.” Malaysian Constr. Res. J. (MCRJ) 37.
Arshad, M. F., M. J. Thaheem, A. R. Nasir, and M. S. A. Malik. 2019. “Contractual risks of building information modeling: Toward a standardized legal framework for design-bid-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (4): 04019010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001617.
Asare, K. A., R. R. Issa, R. Liu, and C. Anumba. 2021. “BIM for facilities management: Potential legal issues and opportunities.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (4): 04521034.
Assaad, R., I. H. El-adaway, A. H. El Hakea, M. J. Parker, T. I. Henderson, C. R. Salvo, and M. O. Ahmed. 2020. “Contractual perspective for BIM utilization in US construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (12): 04020128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001927.
Aven, T. 2016. “Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances in their foundation.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023.
Aven, T., and T. E. Nøkland. 2010. “On the use of uncertainty importance measures in reliability and risk analysis.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95 (2): 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.09.002.
Baharom, M. H., S. N. H. A. Habib, and S. Ismail. 2021. “Building information modelling (BIM): Contractual issues of intellectual property rights (IPR) in construction projects.” Int. J. Sustainable Constr. Eng. Technol. 12 (1): 170–178. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.01.017.
Baker, J. 2022. “Understanding the new role of the AIA forms digital practice documents.” In Baker law, design and construction counsel. Washington, DC: AIA.
Barnes, M. 1983. “How to allocate risks in construction contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage. 1 (1): 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(83)90034-0.
Bing, L., A. Akintoye, P. J. Edwards, and C. Hardcastle. 2005. “The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK.” Int. J. Project Manage. 23 (1): 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.006.
Bodea, C.-N., and A. Purnus. 2018. “Legal implications of adopting Building Information Modeling (BIM).” Juridical Tribune 8 (1): 63–72.
Borgonovo, E. 2006. “Measuring uncertainty importance: Investigation and comparison of alternative approaches.” Risk Anal. 26 (5): 1349–1361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00806.x.
Borgonovo, E. 2007. “A new uncertainty importance measure.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 (6): 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.015.
Celoza, A., D. P. de Oliveira, and F. Leite. 2021. “Identification and ranking of legal factors impacting information management in the AEC industry using the Delphi method.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (4): 04521022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000494.
Chong, H.-Y., S.-L. Fan, M. Sutrisna, S.-H. Hsieh, and C.-M. Tsai. 2017. “Preliminary contractual framework for BIM-enabled projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (7): 04017025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001278.
CIC (Construction Industry Council). 2018. “Construction industry council building information modelling (BIM) protocol second edition standard protocol for use in projects using building information models II ©.” Accessed April 10, 2023. http://www.ocean-design.com.
ConsensusDocs. 2023. “ConsensusDocs contracts.” Accessed April 10, 2023. https://www.consensusdocs.org/contract-catalog/.
Dao, T. N., P. H. Chen, and T. Q. Nguyen. 2021. “Critical success factors and a contractual framework for construction projects adopting building information modeling in Vietnam.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 19 (Aug): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00542-3.
Dao, T. N., T. Q. Nguyen, and P. H. Chen. 2020. “BIM adoption in construction projects funded with state-managed capital in Vietnam: Legal issues and proposed solutions.” In CIGOS 2019, Innovation for Sustainable Infrastructure: Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geotechnics, Civil Engineering Works and Structures, 1211–1216. Singapore: Springer.
David Mcniece, Q. G. 2017. BIM’s legal stumbling blocks: What you need to know. Bracknell, UK: Chartered Institute of Building.
Drennan, L. T., and A. McConnell. 2007. Risk and crisis management in the public sector. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Eastman, C., P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston. 2011. In Vol. 1 of BIM handbook: A guide to building information modelling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Erri Pradeep, A. S., T. W. Yiu, and R. Amor. 2019. “Leveraging blockchain technology in a BIM workflow: A literature review.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Smart Infrastructure and Construction 2019 (ICSIC) Driving Data-Informed Decision-Making, 371–380. London: ICE Publishing.
Fan, S. L. 2020. “Comparative study for BIM-based contract administration between the cases in Taiwan and China.” J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 43 (7): 648–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2020.1777200.
Fan, S. L., H. Y. Chong, P. C. Liao, and C. Y. Lee. 2019. “Latent provisions for building information modeling (BIM) contracts: A social network analysis approach.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 23 (4): 1427–1435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0064-8.
Faulkner, L. 2007. “Driving toward an integrated solution.” In Modern steel construction. Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction.
Flanagan, R., and G. Norman. 1993. Risk management and construction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Flick, U. 2006. An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Fox, S. 2018. Dysfunctional contracts don’t speak our language. Bracknell, UK: Chartered Institute of Building.
Gehlenborg, N., and B. Wong. 2012. “Heat maps.” Nat. Methods 9 (3): 213. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1902.
Ghaffarianhoseini, A., J. Tookey, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, N. Naismith, S. Azhar, O. Efimova, and K. Raahemifar. 2017. “Building information modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 75 (Sep): 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.083.
Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 2017. The discovery of grounded theory. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Hamdi, O., and F. Leite. 2014. “Conflicting side of building information modeling implementation in the construction industry.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 6 (3): 03013004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000137.
Higgs, N., J. Glover, T. Young, and N. Gould. 2017. “Construction law quarterly.” In Vol. 170 of Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 138–147. London: ICE Publishing.
Holmstrom, B. 1979. “Moral hazard and observability.” Bell J. Econ. 10 (1): 74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320.
Hsu, K.-M., T.-Y. Hsieh, and J.-H. Chen. 2015. “Legal risks incurred under the application of BIM in Taiwan.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Forensic Eng. 168 (3): 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1680/feng.14.00005.
International Federation of Consulting Engineers. 2017. FIDIC conditions of contract for construction: For building and engineering works designed by the employer. Geneva: FIDIC Contracts.
Jo, T. M., S. S. M. Ishak, and Z. Z. A. Rashid. 2018. “Overview of the legal aspects and contract requirements of the BIM practice in Malaysian construction industry.” In Vol. 203 of Proc., MATEC Web of Conf., 02011. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences.
Karasu, T., K. Aaltonen, and H. Haapasalo. 2023. “The interplay of IPD and BIM: A systematic literature review.” Constr. Innovation 23 (3): 640–664. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-07-2021-0134.
Kent, D. C., and B. Becerik-Gerber. 2010. “Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000188.
Khawaja, E. U. R., and A. Mustapha. 2021. “Mitigating disputes and managing legal issues in the era of building information modelling.” J. Constr. Dev. Countries 26 (1): 111–130. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2021.26.1.6.
Kuiper, I., and D. Holzer. 2013. “Rethinking the contractual context for building information modelling (BIM) in the Australian built environment industry.” Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build. 13 (4): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v13i4.3630.
Lee, C.-Y., H.-Y. Chong, Q. Li, and X. Wang. 2020. “Joint contract–Function effects on BIM-enabled EPC project performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (3): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)co.1943-7862.0001766.
Liao, X., C. Y. Lee, and H. Y. Chong. 2019. “Contractual practices between the consultant and employer in Chinese BIM-enabled construction projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 27 (1): 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2019-0110.
Lowe, R. H., and J. M. Muncey. 2008. “BIM contracting made easy: The ConsensusDOCS 301 BIM addendum.” McGraw Hill Construction. Accessed September 8, 2009. https://constructor. construction. com/mag/2008_9-10/dept/0809-87.
Mahbod, S., I. Iordavona, and E. Poirier. 2021. “A gap analysis of current CCDC standard contract documents and provisions for successful BIM-enabled projects in Canada.” In Proc., Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conf., 273–285. Singapore: Springer.
Mahdian, A., M. Parchami Jalal, and T. Yavari Roushan. 2023. “Contractual risks of BIM implementation and the proposed contract form for DBB and DB projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 15 (1): 06522003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000561.
Manderson, A., M. Jefferies, and G. Brewer. 2015. “Building information modelling and standardized construction contracts: A content analysis of the GC21 contract.” Constr. Econ. Build. 15 (3): 72. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v15i3.4608.
McAuley, B., A. V. Hore, and R. West. 2012. “Implementing building information modeling in public works projects in Ireland.” In Proc., 9th European Conf. on Product and Process Modelling, 589–596. Dublin, Ireland: Technological Univ. Dublin.
Mcniece, D. 2017. Does NEC4 have the X factor to propel BIM use? Bracknell, UK: Chartered Institute of Building.
Medda, F. 2007. “A game theory approach for the allocation of risks in transport public private partnerships.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (3): 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.06.003.
Naderifar, M., H. Goli, and F. Ghaljaie. 2017. “Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research.” Strides Dev. Med. Educ. 14 (3): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670.
NEC (New Engineering Contract). 2017a. “NEC4: Alliance contract.” Accessed April 4, 2023. https://www.neccontract.com/.
NEC (New Engineering Contract). 2017b. “NEC4: Engineering and construction contract.” Accessed April 4, 2023. https://www.neccontract.com/.
NEC (New Engineering Contract). 2018. Practice note: How to use the CIC BIM protocol with NEC4. London: NEC Contracts.
Nilchian, S., J. Majrouhi Sardroud, M. Darabpour, and S. Tavousi Tafreshi. 2022. “Features and conditions of building information modeling contracts.” Buildings 12 (11): 1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111839.
Olatunji, O. A. 2014. “Views on building information modelling, procurement and contract management.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Manage. Procure. Law 167 (3): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1680/mpal.13.00011.
Oudot, J.-M. 2005. “Risk-allocation: Theoretical and empirical evidences, application to public-Private Partnerships in the defense sector.” In Proc., 9th Annual Conf. of the Institutions of Market Exchange. Melbourne, Australia: Univ. of Melbourne.
Pandey, A., F. Shahbodaghlou, and J. Burger. 2016. “Legal and contractual challenges of building information modeling—Designers’ perspectives.” In Construction research congress 2016, 519–527. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Posner, R. A., and A. M. Rosenfield. 1977. “Impossibility and related doctrines in contract law: An economic analysis.” J. Legal Stud. 6 (1): 83–118. https://doi.org/10.1086/467564.
Ragab, M. A., and M. Marzouk. 2021. “BIM adoption in construction contracts: Content analysis approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (8): 04021094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002123.
Rahman, M. M. 2002. “Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 20 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190110089682.
Raja Berema, R. K. 2021. “Comparative analysis of existing contracts for building information modelling (BIM) projects in Malaysia and selected common law countries.” Int. J. Sustainable Constr. Eng. Technol. 12 (5): 9–15. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.05.002.
Renn, O. 2017. Risk governance. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Shen, L. Y., A. Platten, and X. P. Deng. 2006. “Role of public private partnerships to manage risks in public sector projects in Hong Kong.” Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (7): 587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.07.006.
Siebert, H. 1987. “Risk allocation in large-scale resource ventures.” Kyklos 40 (4): 476–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1987.tb00785.x.
Taghizadeh, K., M. Alizadeh, and T. Yavari Roushan. 2021. “Cooperative game theory solution to design liability assignment issues in BIM projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (9): 04021103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002117.
Tran-Hoang-Minh, H., D. P. Nguyen, and Q. T. Pham. 2021. “Barriers of BIM adoption in Vietnamese contractors.” In Vol. 2428 of Proc., AIP Conf. Long Island, NY: AIP Publishing.
Triantis, G. G. 1992. “Contractual allocations of unknown risks: A critique of the doctrine of commercial impracticability.” Univ. Toronto Law J. 42 (4): 450–483. https://doi.org/10.2307/825792.
Turk, Ž., and R. Klinc. 2017. “Potentials of blockchain technology for construction management.” Procedia Eng. 196 (June): 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052.
Turner, A. 1990. Building procurement. London: Macmillan Education.
Volk, R., J. Stengel, and F. Schultmann. 2014. “Building information modeling (BIM) for existing buildings–Literature review and future needs.” Autom. Constr. 38 (May): 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.023.
Whitford, K. 2016. UK: BIM–What is it and why we think it is yet to be fully embraced. Bristol, UK: Mondaq.
Williams, T. 1995. “A classified bibliography of recent research relating to project risk management.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 85 (1): 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0363-3.
Winfield, M. 2015. Building information modelling: The legal frontier—Overcoming legal and contractual obstacles. New Delhi, India: Society of Construction Law.
Winfield, M. 2016. BIM contracts are leaving liability gaps: A ticking time bomb? Bracknell, UK: Chartered Institute of Building.
Winfield, M. 2018. BIM: The legal frontier: The risks of ignoring the contract. Bracknell, UK: Chartered Institute of Building.
Winfield, M. 2020. “Construction 4.0 and ISO 19650: a panacea for the digital revolution?” In Vol. 173 of Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers—Management, Procurement and Law, 175–181. Leed, UK: Emerald.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16Issue 2May 2024

History

Received: Apr 17, 2023
Accepted: Dec 8, 2023
Published online: Feb 28, 2024
Published in print: May 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jul 28, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Sahra Mohammadi [email protected]
Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, Univ. of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, Univ. of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6896-1682. Email: [email protected]
Mehran Oraee, Ph.D. [email protected]
Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, Univ. of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share